You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! A few weeks ago, on v1.8.19, you switched to having bugfix version in your Go mod and I suggested setting that to go 1.21.0 in #135.
Since then, I have discussed elsewhere this cilium/ebpf/pull/1441 and found this change golang/go@27ed85d that was released in Go 1.21.11 and Go 1.22.4 that I think probably fixed the issue that motivated this change (go 1.21 -> go 1.21.9) in the first place (this one golang/go/issues/62278).
Would you be willing to change the directive back to go 1.21? If not, what's the motivation? For context, I maintain a project that depends on go-hdb and want both to
be able to depend on go 1.21 instead of go 1.21.0 (this has some smaller differences and in general seems more appropriate for a library)
understand the motivation to change this on go-hdb to see if I should instead change it on my end.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
yes, as long as no 'tool' is going to complain, I am fine with 'go1.21' and did the change with https://github.com/SAP/go-hdb/releases/tag/v1.9.8.
This is earliest going to change again (to 'go1.22') after the next go release ('go1.23') will be available.
Hi! A few weeks ago, on v1.8.19, you switched to having bugfix version in your Go mod and I suggested setting that to
go 1.21.0
in #135.Since then, I have discussed elsewhere this cilium/ebpf/pull/1441 and found this change golang/go@27ed85d that was released in Go 1.21.11 and Go 1.22.4 that I think probably fixed the issue that motivated this change (
go 1.21
->go 1.21.9
) in the first place (this one golang/go/issues/62278).Would you be willing to change the directive back to
go 1.21
? If not, what's the motivation? For context, I maintain a project that depends on go-hdb and want both togo 1.21
instead ofgo 1.21.0
(this has some smaller differences and in general seems more appropriate for a library)Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: