Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] p384: scalar arithmetic #376

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

tarcieri
Copy link
Member

This is largely written in a way that it could eventually be extracted into an elliptic_curve::Scalar<C> type, but for now avoids being generic.

Warning: no tests yet; quite likely to be broken in some way.

This is largely written in a way that it could eventually be extracted
into an `elliptic_curve::Scalar<C>` type, but for now avoids being
generic.

Warning: no tests yet; quite likely to be broken in some way.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 27, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #376 (41dbe8b) into master (e6ea3a1) will decrease coverage by 1.15%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #376      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.92%   56.77%   -1.16%     
==========================================
  Files          29       30       +1     
  Lines        4036     4118      +82     
==========================================
  Hits         2338     2338              
- Misses       1698     1780      +82     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
p384/src/scalar.rs 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
k256/src/ecdsa/sign.rs 17.50% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e6ea3a1...41dbe8b. Read the comment docs.

@tarcieri tarcieri closed this Dec 18, 2021
@tarcieri tarcieri deleted the p384/scalar-arithmetic branch December 18, 2021 15:38
@tarcieri
Copy link
Member Author

Closed in favor of #489

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants