You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The structure processor was implemented with xmip (Busecke and Abernathey, 2020)
and follows their guidelines. Note that it is significantly slower than the CDO-implemented modules.
I am very curious to learn what causes the performance difference. Most of the corrections of xmip are applied lazily and should be quite cheap! If you have a minimal example that we could work through, it would be great to post an issue on the xmip issue tracker.
A small comment on the citation: It would be tremendous if you could update the citation to the actual software package doi:10.5281/zenodo.7519179 in the published paper. That would help me a lot in tracking useage and justify working on this software.
Again many thanks for using xMIP and please feel free to reach out with any questions/comments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
just heard the great talk by @liellnima at the ML4ESM workshop, and was super excited to see that xMIP is used!
I wanted to reach out and see if there is any way I can help integrate xMIP better with ClimateSet.
I particular I noted this in the paper
I am very curious to learn what causes the performance difference. Most of the corrections of xmip are applied lazily and should be quite cheap! If you have a minimal example that we could work through, it would be great to post an issue on the xmip issue tracker.
A small comment on the citation: It would be tremendous if you could update the citation to the actual software package doi:10.5281/zenodo.7519179 in the published paper. That would help me a lot in tracking useage and justify working on this software.
Again many thanks for using xMIP and please feel free to reach out with any questions/comments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: