forked from akashpayneSRO/gotraining-studyguide
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
method_2.go
157 lines (137 loc) · 5.45 KB
/
method_2.go
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
// ---------------------------
// Value and Pointer semantics
// ---------------------------
// When it comes to use built-in type (numeric, string, bool), we should always be using value
// semantics. When a piece of code that take an address of an integer or a bool, this raises a
// big flag. It's hard to say because it depends on the context. But in general, why should
// these values end up on the heap creating garbage? These should be on the stack. There
// is an exception to everything. However, until we know it is okay to take the exception, we
// should follow the guideline.
// The reference type (slice, map, channel, interface) also focuses on using value semantic.
// The only time we want to take the address of a slice is when we are sharing it down the call
// stack to Unmarshal function since it always requires the address of a value.
// Examples below are from standard library. By studying them, we learn how important it is to use
// value or pointer semantics in a consistent way.
// When we declare a type, we must ask ourselves immediately:
// - Does this type require value semantic or pointer semantic?
// - If I need to modify this value, should we create a new value or should we modify the value
// itself so everyone can see it?
// It needs to be consistent. It is okay to guess it wrong the first time and refactor it later.
package main
import (
"sync/atomic"
"syscall"
)
// --------------
// Value semantic
// --------------
// These is a named type from the net package called IP and IPMask with a base type that is a
// slice of bytes. Since we use value semantics for reference types, the implementation is
// using value semantics for both.
type IP []byte
type IPMask []byte
// Mask is using a value receiver and returning a value of type IP.
// This method is using value semantics for type IP.
func (ip IP) Mask(mask IPMask) IP {
if len(mask) == IPv6len && len(ip) == IPv4len && allFF(mask[:12]) {
mask = mask[12:]
}
if len(mask) == IPv4len && len(ip) == IPv6len && bytesEqual(ip[:12], v4InV6Prefix) {
ip = ip[12:]
}
n := len(ip)
if n != len(mask) {
return nil
}
out := make(IP, n)
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
out[i] = ip[i] & mask[i]
}
return out
}
// ipEmptyString accepts a value of type IP and returns a value of type string.
// The function is using value semantics for type IP.
func ipEmptyString(ip IP) string {
if len(ip) == 0 {
return ""
}
return ip.String()
}
// ----------------
// Pointer semantic
// ----------------
// Should Time use value or pointer semantics?
// If you need to modify a Time value, should you mutate the value or create a new one?
type Time struct {
sec int64
nsec int32
loc *Location
}
// The best way to understand what semantic is going to be used is to look at the factory function
// for type. It dictates the semantics that will be used. In this example, the Now function
// returns a value of type Time. It is making a copy of its Time value and passing it back up.
// This means Time value can be on the stack. We should be using value semantic all the way
// through.
func Now() Time {
sec, nsec := now()
return Time{sec + unixToInternal, nsec, Local}
}
// Add is a mutation operation. If we go with the idea that we should be using pointer semantic
// when we mutate something and value semantic when we don't then Add is implemented wrong.
// However, it has not been wrong because it is the type that has to drive the semantic, not the
// implementation of the method. The method must adhere to the semantic that we choose.
// Add is using a value receiver and returning a value of type Time. It is mutating its local copy
// and returning to us something new.
func (t Time) Add(d Duration) Time {
t.sec += int64(d / 1e9)
nsec := int32(t.nsec) + int32(d%1e9)
if nsec >= 1e9 {
t.sec++
nsec -= 1e9
} else if nsec < 0 {
t.sec--
nsec += 1e9
}
t.nsec = nsec
return t
}
// div accepts a value of type Time and returns values of built-in types.
// The function is using value semantics for type Time.
// func div(t Time, d Duration) (qmod2 int, r Duration) {}
// The only use of pointer semantics for the `Time` API are these Unmarshal-related functions:
// func (t *Time) UnmarshalBinary(data []byte) error {}
// func (t *Time) GobDecode(data []byte) error {}
// func (t *Time) UnmarshalJSON(data []byte) error {}
// func (t *Time) UnmarshalText(data []byte) error {}
// Observation:
// ------------
// Most struct types are not going to be able to leverage value semantic. Most struct types are
// probably gonna be data that should be shared or more efficient to be shared. For example, an
// User type. Regardless, it is possible to copy an User type but it is not a proper thing to do in
// real world.
// Other examples:
// Factory functions dictate the semantics that will be used. The Open function returns a
// pointer of type File. This means we should be using pointer semantics and share File values.
func Open(name string) (file *File, err error) {
return OpenFile(name, O_RDONLY, 0)
}
// Chdir is using a pointer receiver. This method is using pointer semantics for File.
func (f *File) Chdir() error {
if f == nil {
return ErrInvalid
}
if e := syscall.Fchdir(f.fd); e != nil {
return &PathError{"chdir", f.name, e}
}
return nil
}
// epipecheck accepts a pointer of type File. The function is using pointer semantics for type File.
func epipecheck(file *File, e error) {
if e == syscall.EPIPE {
if atomic.AddInt32(&file.nepipe, 1) >= 10 {
sigpipe()
}
} else {
atomic.StoreInt32(&file.nepipe, 0)
}
}