Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(fuselage): fix duplicated values on paginated multi select #456

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 18, 2021
Merged

fix(fuselage): fix duplicated values on paginated multi select #456

merged 3 commits into from
May 18, 2021

Conversation

MartinSchoeler
Copy link
Contributor

  • I have read the Contributing Guide
  • I have signed the CLA
  • Lint and unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have labeled the PR correctly with the related package
  • I have run Loki's visual regression tests (if applicable)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if applicable)
  • I have added necessary documentation (if applicable)
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

Issue(s)

Further comments

@ggazzo ggazzo changed the title regression: fix duplicated values on paginated multi select fix(fuselage): fix duplicated values on paginated multi select May 18, 2021
@ggazzo ggazzo merged commit 5fbde6d into RocketChat:develop May 18, 2021
ggazzo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2021
@MartinSchoeler
fix(fuselage): fix duplicated values on paginated multi select (#456)
4518a4e
This was referenced Sep 13, 2023
Closed
Closed
Merged
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ggazzo ggazzo ggazzo approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@MartinSchoeler @ggazzo