You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The package name "ios_sdk" is way too generic, and we can't implement it as we already have a dependency with the same name.
Could you update the package name to include the name of your product and prevent conflicts ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In that case, I'd rather recommend creating another repository (let's say Riskified/riskified-ios-sdk) & only keep specs files there, moving xcframework from the repository to the Releases as zip attachment 👌 that can be used in the Package.swift/.podspec as a binary reference (the URL is predictable, it's quite common) as well as downloaded directly (Facebook or Firebase provide zips with releases, too). The benefit would be waaay faster checkout (& less devs' storage occupied) as we wouldn't need to fetch all historical xcframeworks with the repository when Xcode checks out Swift packages.
The package name "ios_sdk" is way too generic, and we can't implement it as we already have a dependency with the same name.
Could you update the package name to include the name of your product and prevent conflicts ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: