Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Package name conflict #25

Open
wsantos24s opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Package name conflict #25

wsantos24s opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@wsantos24s
Copy link

The package name "ios_sdk" is way too generic, and we can't implement it as we already have a dependency with the same name.
Could you update the package name to include the name of your product and prevent conflicts ?

@username0x0a
Copy link

username0x0a commented Sep 20, 2023

In that case, I'd rather recommend creating another repository (let's say Riskified/riskified-ios-sdk) & only keep specs files there, moving xcframework from the repository to the Releases as zip attachment 👌 that can be used in the Package.swift/.podspec as a binary reference (the URL is predictable, it's quite common) as well as downloaded directly (Facebook or Firebase provide zips with releases, too). The benefit would be waaay faster checkout (& less devs' storage occupied) as we wouldn't need to fetch all historical xcframeworks with the repository when Xcode checks out Swift packages.

@SudhirKaushik
Copy link

Hello.. any consideration on this issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants