Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

James 2156 #1

Open
wants to merge 419 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

James 2156 #1

wants to merge 419 commits into from

Conversation

Fredmomo
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

WithTime success case is strictly equivalent to the success case
This needs to be done by wrapping all references to this trait as private
We can leverage stage sharing through generics. Note that also uncouple stages from
each others (to define stage 1, I don't need to know stage 2, only the builder method defining the
stage chain needs that) which is a very nice benefit!

Note that alternative choices are implemented using default methods.
This constant was only used by tests and made the API confusing.
Refactoring this was easy.
Classes go first, then constants, then methods. Note that I inlined a
short method that was not related to the API. This avoids poluting the API
with useless methods
The difference between them was subtil (resolved/unresolved) and prooved
to be confusing. Hence I propose a better method naming for solving this
issue.
This class is going to be removed later in that PR
aduprat and others added 26 commits January 31, 2019 15:12
Tests proved to be unstable. After investigation this is a Reactor related bug.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants