Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Patch <reference index> requires local file #12

Open
fire opened this issue Nov 24, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Patch <reference index> requires local file #12

fire opened this issue Nov 24, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@fire
Copy link

fire commented Nov 24, 2015

>gosync h p
NAME:
   gosync patch - gosync patch <localfile> <reference index> <reference source> [<output>]

USAGE:
   gosync patch [command options] [arguments...]

DESCRIPTION:
   Recreate the reference source file, using an index and a local file that is believed to be similar.
The index should be produced by "gosync build".

<reference index> is a .gosync file and may be a local, unc network path or http/https url
<reference source> is corresponding target and may be a local, unc network path or http/https url
<output> is optional. If not specified, the local file will be overwritten when done.

must currently be a local file contrary to documentation.

>gosync.exe patch Test01.exr http://localhost/Test02.gosync http://localhost/Test02.exr
Starting patching process
open http://localhost/Test02.gosync: The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect.
@fire
Copy link
Author

fire commented Nov 24, 2015

Apparently <reference source> cannot be a local file.

@Redundancy
Copy link
Owner

It's a local file in the sense that it uses file open(), not http get, iirc.

@fire
Copy link
Author

fire commented Nov 25, 2015

I hope it is possible to have it be a local, unc network path or http/https url.

@Redundancy
Copy link
Owner

Ah, you're right. Should definitely be fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants