We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
描述这个 bug 对 bug 作一个清晰简明的描述。 DCN在mvlen100k下uni100与full的AUC差距过大, uni100时auc仅0.58左右,而full时auc为0.78左右,请问原因?谢谢 如何复现 复现这个 bug 的步骤:
load_col: inter: ['user_id', 'item_id', 'rating', 'timestamp'] user: ['user_id', 'age', 'gender', 'occupation'] item: ['item_id', 'release_year', 'class'] threshold: {'rating': 4} normalize_all: True # model config embedding_size: 10 # Training and evaluation config epochs: 500 train_batch_size: 4096 eval_batch_size: 4096 topk: [1,2,3, 10, 100] train_neg_sample_args: ~ metrics: ['AUC'] valid_metric: AUC # eval_args: # # mode: uni100 device: 'cuda:0'
from recbole.quick_start import run_recbole config_dict = { 'device': 'cuda:0' # 或 'cpu',根据您的需求 } run_recbole(model='DCN', dataset='ml-100k', config_file_list=['test.yaml'], config_dict=config_dict)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
请问这是否正常?还请问recbole支持对lightgcn求auc吗?谢谢 @Fotiligner
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
描述这个 bug
对 bug 作一个清晰简明的描述。
DCN在mvlen100k下uni100与full的AUC差距过大, uni100时auc仅0.58左右,而full时auc为0.78左右,请问原因?谢谢
如何复现
复现这个 bug 的步骤:
直接运行即可
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: