You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for sharing your excellent paper on "Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewards". I have some questions regarding the Direction Preference Alignment method, specifically about how the user preference vector ( v ) is incorporated during the model training process.
To be more specific, I would like to understand how the user preference vector ( v ) is actually integrated into the model during the training phase. From my understanding, should the attribute weights be directly concatenated onto the prompt (as you mentioned in the system prompt)?
I look forward to your response.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
Thank you for sharing your excellent paper on "Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewards". I have some questions regarding the Direction Preference Alignment method, specifically about how the user preference vector ( v ) is incorporated during the model training process.
To be more specific, I would like to understand how the user preference vector ( v ) is actually integrated into the model during the training phase. From my understanding, should the attribute weights be directly concatenated onto the prompt (as you mentioned in the system prompt)?
I look forward to your response.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: