examples/gcoap: split client and server implementation #17471
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
maribu
added
CI: ready for build
|
I had to rebase this, as in the meantime some changes were made. But the only relevant to the C code was @chrysn adaption for truncation that I hopefully rebased correctly. |
Move client and server side implementations into separate files to increase readability. Also get rid of a goto.
|
thx :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Contribution description
Move client and server side implementations into separate files to
increase readability. Also get rid of a goto.
Testing procedure
The example should still work as before. Some changes in
.textare expected, but RAM consumption should stay identical. (For my.bssand.dataremain identical and.textgrows by 20 bytes forsamr21-xpro.)Issues/PRs references
None