You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On a scan through the transpiler passes, the only ones I could immediately see that look like they'll need attention are SabreLayout and SabreSwap, tracked in #10232, but since these don't support control-flow at all yet, there's no immediate issue yet.
This issue can be marked fixed once we've verified that there is support at all control-flow supported optimization_level settings through the transpiler (currently 0 and 1), and have added explicit tests to the suite that these expression values are correctly passed through transpile.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
kdk
changed the title
Add support for Expr values through the transpiler pipelines
Add testing for Expr values through the transpiler pipelines
Jul 5, 2023
What should we add?
This is spiritually tracking the work labelled "PR 4" in the initial classical-expression design document.
On a scan through the transpiler passes, the only ones I could immediately see that look like they'll need attention are
SabreLayout
andSabreSwap
, tracked in #10232, but since these don't support control-flow at all yet, there's no immediate issue yet.This issue can be marked fixed once we've verified that there is support at all control-flow supported
optimization_level
settings through the transpiler (currently 0 and 1), and have added explicit tests to the suite that these expression values are correctly passed throughtranspile
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: