-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Filtering on distinct_id
in trends
#7810
Comments
For context the problem is kind of technical:
We could technically make it work without changing mych if we are sure we don't want to support another property like |
Interesting. I'm out of depth here, but:
|
There's also a case to be made for filtering by e.g. CC @pauldambra for #7804 |
Yes
Kind of neither. You need to add a comment to the right clickhouse column, like so: https://github.com/PostHog/posthog/blob/master/ee/clickhouse/materialized_columns/columns.py#L79-L82 However this takes us down a tricky route since:
Hence not suggesting we go down this route - just giving some technical insight. |
What's the status on this? If I'm not able to filter by id, this makes e.g. feature flags almost completely useless for me, as I need to enable for certain companies/users only and id is the only unique identifier we have. The only workaround I could think of so far was to create a second |
@mariusandra Thanks! What's the plan for supporting this? Especially for feature flags this seems to be a core feature. |
Is your feature request related to a problem?
I want to filter by
distinct_id
under trends, and only see what one user did. However the UI does not let me do that... and the API doesn't let me do that either.Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to select
distinct_id
from a list of properties, and filter by it... Like it's a first class citizen.Describe alternatives you've considered
distinct_id
to the filter in the URL manually. This worked, but turns outdistinct_id
is hidden for a reason, and only some integrations send it as a property that I can then filter on.Additional context
This came from a request in the user's Slack.
To solve this, we should either
Thank you for your feature request – we love each and every one!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: