-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Plugin request: Postgres #11
Comments
Was this plugin requested by someone? What's the urgency? Will a The trouble is, if we expose Are there any ways we can get around this without seriously complicating the network setup? Is this something we should be worried about? |
@mariusandra Yeah it was requested by someone using cloud but wanting to do their own analysis on Metabase. Haven't heard from them in a while so probably not top urgency (esp as our focus is shifting to self hosted).
I think something that works out of the box would be nicer but this could work for now if anyone asks. |
I would say the best way for them to load postgres would be via loading data from an s3 dump. Having that gap would be more secure and would be less likely to get shoved over from volume. As for metabase - the best suggestion is for them to spin up a small redshift cluster and have them wrap the data in s3 using that. Loading data to PG is just a bad pattern IMO. |
Ok so I've now ran into this barrier. I’m building a Redshift plugin and was wanting to leverage There's probably some way to get it done via HTTP for Redshift, but not for any random Postgres instance I'd assume. So it'd be great to be able to use the package. Of course as a general rule an S3 dump might be best (also could then use |
This already applies for |
Ah, well, people aren't dumped yet. Exporting people is something we've been discussing how to do. |
I want to dump all my people and events into a postgres database so I can use metabase to do queries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: