Sourcery refactored main branch

[sourcery-ai]

Branch main refactored by Sourcery.

If you're happy with these changes, merge this Pull Request using the Squash and merge strategy.

See our documentation here.

Run Sourcery locally

Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:

• VS Code
• PyCharm

Review changes via command line

To manually merge these changes, make sure you're on the main branch, then run:

git fetch origin sourcery/main
git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
git reset HEAD^

Help us improve this pull request!

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

❌  Merging this PR will decrease code quality in the affected files by 0.53%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	11.45 🙂	11.54 🙂	0.09 👎
Method Length	53.67 ⭐	53.51 ⭐	-0.16 👍
Working memory	9.95 😞	10.12 😞	0.17 👎
Quality	65.54% 🙂	65.01% 🙂	-0.53% 👎

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	2144	2111	-33

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
examples/tweet_generator/tweet_generator.py	67.18% 🙂	67.19% 🙂	0.01% 👍
pincer/commands/commands.py	47.71% 😞	45.77% 😞	-1.94% 👎
pincer/commands/components/decorators.py	79.01% ⭐	79.30% ⭐	0.29% 👍
pincer/objects/app/interactions.py	74.71% 🙂	74.26% 🙂	-0.45% 👎
pincer/utils/event_mgr.py	86.73% ⭐	86.84% ⭐	0.11% 👍

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
pincer/commands/commands.py	command	61 ⛔	417 ⛔	26 ⛔	4.43% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
pincer/commands/commands.py	register_command	12 🙂	247 ⛔	21 ⛔	31.07% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
pincer/commands/commands.py	ChatCommandHandler.__build_local_commands	20 😞	220 ⛔	12 😞	35.47% 😞	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
pincer/objects/app/interactions.py	Interaction.__post_init__	14 🙂	182 😞	15 😞	38.75% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
examples/tweet_generator/tweet_generator.py	Bot.twitter	2 ⭐	219 ⛔	9 🙂	57.13% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

[Lunarmagpie]

Why are all of these things I did 💀

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #388 (9dda9d1) into main (53a0452) will increase coverage by 0.63%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #388      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.54%   91.17%   +0.63%     
==========================================
  Files           8        9       +1     
  Lines          74      102      +28     
==========================================
+ Hits           67       93      +26     
- Misses          7        9       +2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
tests/objects/guild/test_permission.py	92.85% <0.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 53a0452...9dda9d1. Read the comment docs.