You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Let's just outline some things that can emerge so we have them in mind.
In Catarse's case, we'll probably not have all the features & interface of the player. I'd argue that all we need, for normal users, are: the controls, a "share" button and a "login" button". And then, in the end of the video, before recommendations, we can have a screen (layout like Vimeo's "share" page in their player) that just tells you in 1-2 sentences about Paratii, and prompts you to share that video in order to earn some money and help the project as you can. So in this screen you can sign up (our signup), get a custom link for embedding + sharing options to FB, telegram, whatsapp, etc, that trace the viewer back to you: the user who "shared". Now you have an account, and a way to be identified/rewarded. Note that, in Catarse's case, sharing is also prompted from below the video. We can also have a rule that says, if it's a video on Paratii, this box of options below the video turns into another color, or something like this.
Is it a widget @geckoslair? Something we could standardise and offer?
4.1 The creator can choose to allocate a % of what the project raises to "sharers", or better, "sharers who bring in someone who shares too". He sets this at some custom step in the uploading process above, and the amount represented by the % is distributed in PTI to the accounts of these people (along a nice email), after the project owner has paid for this PTI from what he raised. If he doesn't comply w/ the obligation, the distribution simply does not happen (note: this is not a "finders fee". Such would mean rewarding those who bring in people who actually "donate" to the project. Since this happens over Catarse's platform, and not yet in crypto, we'd have extra complications as for matching our data w/ theirs).
4.2 Rewards can be tokenised. So, at the moment this is supported by the platforms, users pay in fiat / crypto and get tokens that are tradable for rewards, and that are tradable by the project owner for the fiat money they represented. I don't see much direct interference in the video side of things, but we can consider these as a source of potential integrations (e.g. if you bring in more than 10K audience to my video, you'll earn a token for reward tier-1; if you bring in more than 50K audience, you'll earn reward 2; etc).
4.3 In the case there ever happens to exist a secondary market for rewards, PTI can be one of its currencies.
4.4 In the case of works to be digitally distributed and monetised, there can be rewards that actually allow for contributors to earn revenue share of the work. Like pay R$10.000 and earn 5% of what my movie earns. But this, again, involves more complexity as for tracking revenue universally.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See #5 for upload functionality in catarse.
Let's just outline some things that can emerge so we have them in mind.
In Catarse's case, we'll probably not have all the features & interface of the player. I'd argue that all we need, for normal users, are: the controls, a "share" button and a "login" button". And then, in the end of the video, before recommendations, we can have a screen (layout like Vimeo's "share" page in their player) that just tells you in 1-2 sentences about Paratii, and prompts you to share that video in order to earn some money and help the project as you can. So in this screen you can sign up (our signup), get a custom link for embedding + sharing options to FB, telegram, whatsapp, etc, that trace the viewer back to you: the user who "shared". Now you have an account, and a way to be identified/rewarded. Note that, in Catarse's case, sharing is also prompted from below the video. We can also have a rule that says, if it's a video on Paratii, this box of options below the video turns into another color, or something like this.
Is it a widget @geckoslair? Something we could standardise and offer?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: