You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So, when grouping by the above data types, I would expect there to be one PHI ID for each group. Instead, there are over 100 groups where there is more than one PHI ID (a one-to-many mapping), as shown in the table below.
@martin2urban Is there some other criteria for assigning PHI IDs that I'm missing, or is the data below a result of an error in the logic used to assign the IDs?
jseager7
changed the title
PHI-base 4 interaction IDs violating their own uniqueness rules?
Are PHI-base 4 interaction IDs violating their own uniqueness rules?
Aug 25, 2022
The PHI-base curator guidelines state the following about PHI-base accession IDs in PHI-base 4:
My understanding is that there is a one-to-one mapping between a PHI-base accession ID (PHI ID) and the following triple of data types:
(PMID, Pathogen NCBI Taxonomy ID, UniProtKB accession number)
So, when grouping by the above data types, I would expect there to be one PHI ID for each group. Instead, there are over 100 groups where there is more than one PHI ID (a one-to-many mapping), as shown in the table below.
@martin2urban Is there some other criteria for assigning PHI IDs that I'm missing, or is the data below a result of an error in the logic used to assign the IDs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: