Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 1, 2023. It is now read-only.

Fix network handling #303

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Dec 16, 2022
Merged

Conversation

andrew-fleming
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #297.

The current flow of network handling creates the awkward issue of an unresolved query in perpetuity when the node.json exists but the network key does not. This PR, therefore, proposes to add goerli2 and integration gateways to the node.json in the nile node command. This means that the goerli2 and integration gateways will be accessible irrespective of the node.json file's existence.

martriay
martriay previously approved these changes Nov 23, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@martriay martriay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good patch. but i think the real solution is to centralize file writes to avoid this kind of bug. it's also a bit awkward that get_gateways writes anywhere, we should either refactor or rename.

@andrew-fleming
Copy link
Contributor Author

Agreed on centralizing file writes and with that, a refactor on get_gateways. Should we keep this patch for now or go for the refactor in this PR?

@martriay
Copy link
Contributor

if you think it's small enough, let's squeeze it here. otherwise the patch + tracking the issue is enough.

@andrew-fleming
Copy link
Contributor Author

if you think it's small enough, let's squeeze it here.

On it!

Copy link
Member

@ericnordelo ericnordelo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix @andrew-fleming! Left some comments.

src/nile/common.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -39,11 +43,7 @@ def get_gateways():

except FileNotFoundError:
with open(NODE_FILENAME, "w") as f:
networks = {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the try block above, gateway should be in plural.

Also, I think this is still not working for sending transactions if goerli2 is not in the node.json file, but the file exists. OTHER_NETWORKS are added just when the file is not found. Maybe return it in the try block as well?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we do this, I think it makes sense to remove writing the DEFAULT_NETWORKS to the node.json file at all, because it will be part of GATEWAYS always anyway.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it makes sense to remove writing the DEFAULT_NETWORKS to the node.json file

It seems difficult to handle (at least, to cleanly handle) localhost network calls when the node.json is not present with this approach^. I think we'd have to add conditionals to get_gateway_url and get_feeder_url in starknet_cli.py. Maybe there's a better way. If it's agreeable, I'd say let's make another issue to track that for the future.

Copy link
Member

@ericnordelo ericnordelo Nov 26, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need to handle localhost calls when node.json is not present with this approach? The suggestion is to remove DEFAULT_NETWORKS, which are goerli2 and integration, which gateway_urls won't probably change often. localhost calls would still be going through node.json. Sorry if I'm missing something.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Forgive me, I did not provide enough context in my response.

The idea was to handle localhost separately from DEFAULT_NETWORKS through some sort of conditional. Otherwise, a node.json will be created (if it's not already) for txs querying the DEFAULT_NETWORKS. This doesn't break anything; however, it's not ideal. This occurs because GATEWAYS.get() returns None when a key does not exist instead of an error that we can handle.

I'm interested in the networks config idea.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it.

My issue with the current PR state is that it is not addressing the real issue IMO, which is the UX using Nile. We can use a different approach than the one I suggested in this thread (mine is probably not the best for sure), but letting this as it is, I fear users will upgrade Nile, and they will struggle with sending transactions to goerli2 or integration. You and I both know how to fix it, but I feel the error they will receive is not well documented (and I think we could prevent the issue by default). Is the details what makes great tooling IMO (hardhat vs truffle).

Copy link
Member

@ericnordelo ericnordelo Nov 28, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to give some sort of priority to UX issues like this because they harm adoption. Even if we have a lot of cool functionalities, if we do have not a solid UX, users won't use them IMO as a dev.

I'm of course ok with letting the solution like this if you guys think is enough.

Copy link
Contributor

@martriay martriay Dec 1, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is my middle ground suggestion:

  • let's not write any node.json. it's confusing pollution to the user, and it's information nile already knows. no more writing conflicts nor retrocompatibility issues.
  • let's still read node.json. if there's any user custom network, let's add it (or overwrite any default). this is the stem for an actual nile config file, but retrocompatible and it buys us time to design properly, while fixing this.

thoughts?

src/nile/common.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/nile/common.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/nile/common.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/nile/core/node.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/nile/core/node.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/test_common.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/test_common.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
"goerli2": "https://alpha4-2.starknet.io",
"integration": "https://external.integration.starknet.io",
}
networks = {"localhost": "http://127.0.0.1:5050/", **OTHER_NETWORKS}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we add DEFAULT_GATEWAYS to queries even when the node.json exists:

Suggested change
networks = {"localhost": "http://127.0.0.1:5050/", **OTHER_NETWORKS}
networks = {"localhost": "http://127.0.0.1:5050/"}

Copy link
Member

@ericnordelo ericnordelo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andrew-fleming The refactor looks good, but this PR is not solving the linked issue imo. Even when the error message differs from the last merges, the expected behavior, for me at least, is goerli2 transactions working by default (there are no docs telling users they need to add this manually to node.json afaik).

I think we have enough content with these different networks to add a nile.ini (or different name) required config file with networks instead of deleting/creating a node.json file.

Adding these networks by default to the ini file and documenting this would be a huge improvement to the UX IMO.

Interested in what you guys think about this two thoughts:

  1. Issue resolution that I think could be solved by returning the DEFAULT_GATEWAYS in the get_gateways method even when they are not in the node.json file.
  2. Replace node.json with nile.ini file with a networks config.

src/nile/core/node.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@andrew-fleming
Copy link
Contributor Author

andrew-fleming commented Nov 28, 2022

this PR is not solving the linked issue imo. Even when the error message differs from the last merges, the expected behavior, for me at least, is goerli2 transactions working by default (there are no docs telling users they need to add this manually to node.json afaik).

The patch does solve that^. The user doesn't have to add anything manually. The flow was that if a node.json exists, localhost and DEFAULT_NETWORKS would already be written in the json. If the node.json doesn't exist, it would be created with all three networks ready to go. Please correct me if I misunderstood the comment.

This PR now (since after that review) doesn't write the DEFAULT_NETWORKS to the node.json. Instead, it follows the suggestion of returning the contents of node.json (which consists only of localhost) with the DEFAULT_GATEWAYS dictionary from common.py.

  1. Issue resolution that I think could be solved by returning the DEFAULT_GATEWAYS in the get_gateways method even when they are not in the node.json file.
  2. Replace node.json with nile.ini file with a networks config.

The latest pushed changes follow #1. The one minor issue with this flow is that a node.json will be created (if it doesn't already exist) when querying DEFAULT_NETWORKS.

If we want to go for #2, we should adjust the issue size or create a new issue :)

@ericnordelo
Copy link
Member

The patch does solve that^. The user doesn't have to add anything manually. The flow was that if a node.json exists, localhost and DEFAULT_NETWORKS would already be written in the json. If the node.json doesn't exist, it would be created with all three networks ready to go. Please correct me if I misunderstood the comment.

This is assuming users would follow the flow, but my concern was also with upgrades, like what happened to me: Dev already have a nile project, already having a node.json file, they try to use goerli2, cryptic error not documented.

If we want to go for #2, we should adjust the issue size or create a new issue :)

Totally agree. I think we should prioritize this as possible (not necessarily my proposed solution, but something to improve the network handling). cc @martriay



def get_gateways():
"""Get the StarkNet node details."""
try:
with open(NODE_FILENAME, "r") as f:
gateway = json.load(f)
return gateway

gateways = {**gateway, **DEFAULT_GATEWAYS}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what happens if there's a conflicting goerli2 or integration network? would it be overwritten by this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If there's a conflicting network, the DEFAULT_GATEWAYS network would overwrite it in the local variable gateways when the gateways dict is passed to the querying function. Thus, "goerli2": "new_url" in node.json will return the goerli2 from DEFAULT_NETWORKS

I'll switch the order so that the node.json's gateway overwrites the DEFAULT_GATEWAYS network of the same name

"""Create node.json and return gateways."""
with open(NODE_FILENAME, "w") as f:
gateway = {network: gateway_url}
f.write(json.dumps(gateway))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no more indent=2?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The idea was to only have one gateway in node.json, but I'll add the indent back so it's formatted for users who want to add more networks

@@ -39,11 +43,7 @@ def get_gateways():

except FileNotFoundError:
with open(NODE_FILENAME, "w") as f:
networks = {
Copy link
Contributor

@martriay martriay Dec 1, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is my middle ground suggestion:

  • let's not write any node.json. it's confusing pollution to the user, and it's information nile already knows. no more writing conflicts nor retrocompatibility issues.
  • let's still read node.json. if there's any user custom network, let's add it (or overwrite any default). this is the stem for an actual nile config file, but retrocompatible and it buys us time to design properly, while fixing this.

thoughts?

@ericnordelo
Copy link
Member

this is my middle ground suggestion:

let's not write any node.json. it's confusing pollution to the user, and it's information nile already knows. no more writing conflicts nor retrocompatibility issues.

let's still read node.json. if there's any user custom network, let's add it (or overwrite any default). this is the stem for an actual nile config file, but retrocompatible and it buys us time to design properly, while fixing this.

thoughts?

Just confirming. You mean not writing to the node.json file after creating it, but keeping all network configurations and reading from it, right? I'd keep all the networks in a network config, to allow changing the RPC providers (gateway_urls) if we have more than one at some point for the same network (I assume we'll have).

@martriay
Copy link
Contributor

martriay commented Dec 1, 2022

Just confirming. You mean not writing to the node.json file after creating it, but keeping all network configurations and reading from it, right? I'd keep all the networks in a network config, to allow changing the RPC providers (gateway_urls) if we have more than one at some point for the same network (I assume we'll have).

I mean not write/create any node.json files anymore, but take it into account if there's one already (e.g. with a custom network). this would be retrocompatible and fix the UX issue you point out, without us introducing any weird, fragile logic to overwrite/fix existing node.json files, and also provide a way for users to add their custom ones.

node.json would be the network file you suggest, my approach only simplifies it so we can ship a fix asap. this node.json file can eventually evolve into a full config file #73, but i'm leaving it for later to avoid the design + refactor time it entails.

@andrew-fleming
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here's a few notes on the latest changes aiming to address the conversations regarding this PR @martriay @ericnordelo:

  • The default localhost now belongs in DEFAULT_GATEWAYS.
  • node.json will only be written when nile node receives a different host or port i.e. nile node --port 5001.
    • In the event that the localhost key points to a different value (this key/value entry would only exist in the node.json), the network will favor the node.json value.
    • When the node.json receives new entries, the previous entries will not be deleted. Should the node.json receive a duplicate key, however, the new value will overwrite the old.

martriay
martriay previously approved these changes Dec 6, 2022
Comment on lines 55 to 60
with open(NODE_FILENAME, "r") as fp:
gateways = json.load(fp)
gateways[network] = gateway_url

with open(NODE_FILENAME, "w") as fp:
json.dump(gateways, fp, indent=2)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
with open(NODE_FILENAME, "r") as fp:
gateways = json.load(fp)
gateways[network] = gateway_url
with open(NODE_FILENAME, "w") as fp:
json.dump(gateways, fp, indent=2)
with open(NODE_FILENAME, "w") as fp:
gateways = json.load(fp)
gateways[network] = gateway_url
json.dump(gateways, fp, indent=2)

isn't this simpler? why indent is only explicit here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is simpler^, but the w will remove the prior contents. This gives me an idea though

src/nile/common.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Martín Triay <[email protected]>
martriay
martriay previously approved these changes Dec 10, 2022
ericnordelo
ericnordelo previously approved these changes Dec 11, 2022
Copy link
Member

@ericnordelo ericnordelo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good! Left just a small suggestion and I think we are good to go.



def get_gateways():
"""Get the StarkNet node details."""
try:
if os.path.exists(NODE_FILENAME):
with open(NODE_FILENAME, "r") as f:
gateway = json.load(f)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
gateway = json.load(f)
custom_gateways = json.load(f)

The name is a bit confusing being possible to have multiple custom gateways in the node.json file.

Copy link
Member

@ericnordelo ericnordelo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@martriay martriay merged commit 8ca995a into OpenZeppelin:main Dec 16, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Issue trying to use goerli2 in commands
3 participants