[feature request] renaming of automatically-made dep update prs

[DerekNonGeneric]

We have regularly been receiving dependency update requests from the following:

• @snyk-bot

• @dependabot

• @renovate-bot

They each have their own way of titling their PRs and sometimes those titles match the first line of the commit message (other times they do not). The request is to fix these requests to match our needs.

[DerekNonGeneric]

When we do make our package releases, our deployments should contain a CHANGELOG file, which will be retrieved by these services for providing information in their comments (or elsewhere).

@snyk-bot

• TODO

@dependabot

• TODO

@renovate-bot

• Major overhaul of changelog retrieval renovatebot/renovate#14138

[DerekNonGeneric]

Renovate bumping a GitHub action: #196

How should we standardize these PR title renamings?

[DerekNonGeneric]

This is going to have to be taken care of by @shellscape.

[DerekNonGeneric]

So, what is a "Semantic PR" then? We're removing the app and will be defining the term here.

FTR: https://github.com/Ezard/semantic-prs being non-configurable means that it is now removed as it was unable to be used.

Would prefer using https://github.com/OpenINF/openinf-action-semantic-pull-request

[DerekNonGeneric]

what is a "Semantic PR" then?

It would at least be composed of:

1. Conventional PR Title
2. Commit Message Body
   a. Description of Changes
   b. Commit Message Footer (trailers)

[DerekNonGeneric]

@shellscape communicated to me that his time is too limited to commit to getting this worked out, so went ahead and unassigned, but hopefully he will be pinged on this to review our solution when ready.

[DerekNonGeneric]

https://github.com/OpenINF/openinf-util-object/actions/runs/5213428630/workflow?pr=344#L31

[DerekNonGeneric]

Renovate now concludes PR titles w/ major (breakingly) changed updated deps w/ (major):

#513

But not always; perhaps only for the monorepos.

[DerekNonGeneric]

Seems like the PR for bumping an action is going to have to be made by @OpenINFbot w/ proper automation code seeing as how Renovate is currently quite bad at naming the actual version being updated in the PR title.

See: OpenINF/docker-fisher#19
Refs: https://twitter.com/DerekNonGeneric/status/1723205132806918213

[DerekNonGeneric]

That is just another one where there was missing noise; actually, is
a case needing perhaps another one more approval or a ci run!!

Refs: #664

---

that would ideally be built here, actually, via ci per pr.