-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We should add the term money to oeo-social #335
Comments
Couple of thoughts on this, because they are an issue for IAMs (and probably some ESMs as well):
So "money" strongly depends on spatial and temporal classifications. |
Thanks for these thoughts that go beyond money as a medium for exchange. I wonder whether we could start defining money very generically as a medium for exchange first (this issue). An then add further terms to the ontology that follow up on more specifics (which go along with money as a medium of exchange)? So for example we could define: Money (either physical or virtual) is a medium for exchange. And then determine what further definitions we need. Further food for thought: @jannahastings: what do you think about the thoughts above? I have marked bold these terms for which I think we may need further definitions based on @0UmfHxcvx5J7JoaOhFSs5mncnisTJJ6q thoughts. |
This is an important and broad topic. From an ontological point of view, money is a dependent entity. It is a complex dependent entity as it partly depends on social entities and partly on physical entities. Money is the bearer of economic value, which may be realised in economic exchanges. Money is in some sense a generically dependent entity that has different concretizations (e.g. paper money, electronic money, coins, etc.) In Barry Smith's 'Toward an Ontology of Commercial Exchange', he defines 'act of payment' as "act of payment=def. social act in which one party transfers an amount of money to another party, wherein the agent relinquishes ownership thereof and the other party acquires ownership thereof." They go on to write "In modern commerce, the transfer of ownership is frequently assisted with instruments of payment such as cash, check, or electronic transfer. Such instruments are documents (a subclassof IAO:information content entity) which are specified as having some monetary value relative to some unit of currency. These documents can be concretized in metal (coins), on paper, or in computer systems. In the metal and paper (money) cases there is an independent document entity which is an amount of money which can be used to buy things with (can be transferred in an act of commercial exchange). In the computer system case the pixels on a screen or the electromagnetic excitations on a server merely represent money." (italics added). As per the discussion above, we should distinguishing different sorts of entity:
Some of these entities are defined in FIBO, we should also look there for inspiration? E.g. currency. |
Definition:
Description:
Energy system models care neither about how payments are made, nor how money is made, so we don't need the "concretization of a portion of money" or " social and legal institutions, organisations and entities that define and regulate money". |
This is highly related to #342.
I guess your suggestions fit for "portion of money". |
A price is the relation of economic value (measured in money) to the quantity of something else (the good). The price of electricity may be expressed in €/MWh. 17 MWh of electricity would than have an economic value of seventeen times the price – measured in € (money). |
I think economic value is not necessarily equal to the price price paid/asked. |
An additional attribute |
Coming back to the beginning, I wonder whether as a "foundation" we could define money as: Money is a universal medium for exchange And then work along FIBO to get more specific, e.g. start to define amount of money which is according to FIBO: a sum of money. With the editorial note: This is an actual sum of money, not the measure of a sum of money in monetary units, although it has the same basic properties (decimal number with a currenct unit). If this approach would be suitable, we could leave the definition of money very generic and add further issues for specification. The first one would then be for amount of money. |
oeo dev meeting 14 |
I can participate. |
Thanks @stap-m ! |
@litotes18, @stap-m, @jannahastings, @han-f poll is up: https://terminplaner4.dfn.de/KFASKlPpTlLVm4zx, covering this and next week. |
Kinda expected to be notified about participation by terminplamer4, which didn't happened. That's what you get for using copy-cats... |
I can make a Teams appointment in case Teams works for all of us (@jannahastings, @stap-m , @litotes18 , @0UmfHxcvx5J7JoaOhFSs5mncnisTJJ6q ) ? |
Should be OK for me :-) |
My success rate for getting on Teams calls so far was below 20 %. Anything that rules out DFNconf? |
I am fine with DFN, but cannot organise it, can you please do it? |
Sure. |
I am not sure I know which DFN room to visit coming monday. |
Let's use this one: |
In the meeting on October 18 we (@0UmfHxcvx5J7JoaOhFSs5mncnisTJJ6q , @stap-m , @jannahastings and @han-f ) derived the following definitions:
cc @litotes18 |
And we also thought it would be good to add the following to the definition of
|
While implementing it occured to me that, instead of having |
I agree that the mentioned concepts are subclasses of |
Description of the issue
Money is used to exchange commodities, no matter if these are physical, energy-flows, financial, services .. .
Ideas of solution
Money is a universal medium for exchange
Money is also a commodity for storing exchangeable wealth.
Work along "An ontology of economic objects", Gloria Zuniga (1999).
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/5566/1/Ontology_of_Economic_Objects.pdf
Workflow checklist
I am aware that
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: