You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I discussed this topic on friday bilaterally with @u-mueller. We came to the conclusion, that currently on of the most important points, the research question(s) of the study and the scenarios, of the scenario are not properly depicted in the OEKG. I mention this here, because if we interpret the keywords as additional descriptors, then we need to find a way to depict the research question with ontology terms.
I discussed it with @adelmemariani
It would be nice to have that and it is an interesting task. Yet, it is nothing that can be inplemented just like that. it requires some research and also a more detailed idea of how it could look like. I would propose to discard this idea for the first stable factsheet version and adress the specifications later.
I discussed this topic on friday bilaterally with @u-mueller. We came to the conclusion, that currently on of the most important points, the research question(s) of the study and the scenarios, of the scenario are not properly depicted in the OEKG. I mention this here, because if we interpret the keywords as additional descriptors, then we need to find a way to depict the research question with ontology terms.
Originally posted by @l-emele in #19 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: