You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Our scenario includes the following technologies: PV, wind, biomass, biogas, solar thermal, heat pump, gas, coal, oil, CHP, electricity, gas, heat. As the non expert user I am, I would expect all of those to be keywords for our study/scenario, but I found it difficult to map them all with clarity and the impression that I need to sort of split them into those categories is an additional factor of confusion for me.
sector
energy carriers
energy transformation process
all of the above
I realize that this is a complex task, but ideally the interface would guide the user to differentiate the categories above or auto-suggestion related fields.
@han-f@l-emele@Ludee@u-mueller your feedback would be helpful here.
Do you face a similar confusion? Can you provide ideas for a better structure/interface?
Can't we - for the keywords - use auto-suggestions from the OEO excluding those terms from the checkboxes in the sector, energy carriers and energy transformation processes sections?
This comes from issue #19
Our scenario includes the following technologies: PV, wind, biomass, biogas, solar thermal, heat pump, gas, coal, oil, CHP, electricity, gas, heat. As the non expert user I am, I would expect all of those to be keywords for our study/scenario, but I found it difficult to map them all with clarity and the impression that I need to sort of split them into those categories is an additional factor of confusion for me.
I realize that this is a complex task, but ideally the interface would guide the user to differentiate the categories above or auto-suggestion related fields.
Originally posted by @christian-rli in #19 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: