You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is a pre-defined list of keywords (study) and additional keywords (scenario). This list is rather limited and some studies or scenarios may not select any. If none is selected the "Keywords:" still shows on the factsheet overview, with no content followed. This may appear as if the users did not bother to provide keywords. I would like to suggest to either not shows "Keywords:" on the overview if none were supplied or to think about how we can better implement the possibility to provide keywords.
Ideas of solution
not show "Keywords:" at all when no entries are available
allow users to choose from a richer list of keywords
Thanks for the issue. Are the proposed suggestions exclusive or should they be combined?
Regarding option 1: should there me an option "none" if no keywords should be added?
Regarding option 2: Please feel free to suggest more keywords.
We should discuss option 3 with caution. Is it really required for the factsheets or can we find a cleaner solution? For example: how could we implement a procedure to propose new keywords to the OEKG/OEO?
Long lists of keywords are the opposite of user friendliness, and suggesting new keywords should be as easy as possible, but I see the point. Maybe we discuss this at the OEKG-Dev meeting tomorrow or on our PM.
EDIT: Notes from SIROP project meeting 2023-04-06:
Distinguish into two cases:
1. missing in factsheet but available in OEO
- add OEO autocomplete descriptors
- define list of OEO autocomplete descriptors #19
2. missing in factsheet and OEO
- guide people through workflow that adds term to the ontology (complicated future work)
- intermediate solution: link to the github oeo new term issue template course in the tutorial section about how to request new oeo terms
- once the composed module is there, give the opportunity to add composed terms
New developments on keywords/descriptors are adressed in #19, that include this issue. Therefore I close this issue now.
Description of the issue
There is a pre-defined list of keywords (study) and additional keywords (scenario). This list is rather limited and some studies or scenarios may not select any. If none is selected the "Keywords:" still shows on the factsheet overview, with no content followed. This may appear as if the users did not bother to provide keywords. I would like to suggest to either not shows "Keywords:" on the overview if none were supplied or to think about how we can better implement the possibility to provide keywords.
Ideas of solution
Workflow checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: