-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Python: fix cross-compilation of extension modules #53320
Comments
|
Useful changeset SynoCommunity/spksrc@6a071f8 |
We need to keep Using |
Seems like we need a special Python for building extension modules (talking about cross-compiling
|
Oh yeah, I've made python3 = super.python3.override {
packageOverrides = pythonself: pythonsuper: {
numpy = pythonsuper.numpy.overrideAttrs (old: {
_PYTHON_HOST_PLATFORM = pkgs.lib.removeSuffix "-" self.stdenv.cc.targetPrefix;
buildPython = self.buildPackages.python3;
patches = (old.patches or []) ++ [
(self.writeText "numpy-patch-cross-extensions.diff" ''
diff --git a/numpy/distutils/ccompiler.py b/numpy/distutils/ccompiler.py
index 14451fa..39dbf8f 100644
--- a/numpy/distutils/ccompiler.py
+++ b/numpy/distutils/ccompiler.py
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ def CCompiler_spawn(self, cmd, display=None):
display = ' '.join(list(display))
log.info(display)
try:
- subprocess.check_output(cmd)
+ subprocess.check_output([ (cmd[0] if cmd[0].startswith("${self.stdenv.cc.targetPrefix}") else "${self.stdenv.cc.targetPrefix}" + cmd[0]) ] + [ (arg.replace(os.environ['buildPython'], "${self.python3}")) for arg in cmd[1:]])
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as exc:
o = exc.output
s = exc.returncode
diff --git a/numpy/random/setup.py b/numpy/random/setup.py
index a820d32..fa1d536 100644
--- a/numpy/random/setup.py
+++ b/numpy/random/setup.py
@@ -51,9 +51,9 @@ def configuration(parent_package=''', top_path=None):
EXTRA_COMPILE_ARGS += ['-std=c99']
INTEL_LIKE = any(arch in platform.machine()
for arch in ('x86', 'i686', 'i386', 'amd64'))
- if INTEL_LIKE:
- # Assumes GCC or GCC-like compiler
- EXTRA_COMPILE_ARGS += ['-msse2']
+ #if INTEL_LIKE:
+ # # Assumes GCC or GCC-like compiler
+ # EXTRA_COMPILE_ARGS += ['-msse2']
# Use legacy integer variable sizes
LEGACY_DEFS = [('NP_RANDOM_LEGACY', '1')]
'')
];
});
};
self = self.python3;
}; it builds numpy without references to build python. @FRidh What is nice, your suggestion about nuked references wasn't an issue at all (e.g. it compiles even with refs nuked). PS: I still haven't run this, so don't know if it works. |
That's convenient, though we of course need to check that for more packages. A fix: |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
It sounds like the basic issue is that configure-script-like-things are not aware of cross compilation at all. |
#91178 was a generic fix. I am not aware of any further issues, but then again, I don't use cross-compilation myself. |
Splicing of Python packages in #104201. |
Issue description
The changes in #53123 improve the cross-compilation situation of Python. It's now possible to produce functioning cross-compiled Python packages.
Neither the interpreter nor the packages will depend on the build machine. It does involve in both the interpreter and
wrapPythonPrograms
an ugly hack to rewrite shebangs from build Python to host Python. This is a general issue discussed in #33956. In this case I think we should somehow instructdistutils
of our host Python.Cross-compiling extension modules still fails. In the interpreter build we've nuked references to the compiler, and that seems to be an issue. When not cross-compiling, all goes fine though.
Steps to reproduce
Technical details
Please run
nix-shell -p nix-info --run "nix-info -m"
and paste theresults.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: