You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As an example, Ordinal 0 shows 0b11111001111 (0x7cf/1999) when it should be 2x larger (0xf9e) 0b111110011110. Fixing requires making the field size for releaseYear and object size 1 bit larger (12 and 22). As is, the release year would be -999.
The bitmap is pressed for space as it is. Maybe all that's required is to adjust the text in advanced-topics.md to call out that the example doesn't show the releaseYear as zig-zag encoded.
The id also doesn't seem to be zig-zag encoded (assuming negative IDs were not intentional).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As an example, Ordinal 0 shows 0b11111001111 (0x7cf/1999) when it should be 2x larger (0xf9e) 0b111110011110. Fixing requires making the field size for releaseYear and object size 1 bit larger (12 and 22). As is, the release year would be -999.
The bitmap is pressed for space as it is. Maybe all that's required is to adjust the text in advanced-topics.md to call out that the example doesn't show the releaseYear as zig-zag encoded.
The id also doesn't seem to be zig-zag encoded (assuming negative IDs were not intentional).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: