Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEAT] V4 Complex Voting #141

Open
NeonClary opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

[FEAT] V4 Complex Voting #141

NeonClary opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request triage New issue needs review

Comments

@NeonClary
Copy link
Member

Objective

Enable complex voting mechanisms, somewhat under Admin level user control if possible.
Currently, bots each have a mechanism, and LLMs all use Perplexity. Enable further complexity and customization, especially for LLMs participants.

Initial Implementation Requirements

I imagine it's too early to map this out in detail. -Clary

Other Considerations

Once we have a robust discussion phase setup, we could add complexity to the voting process beyond simply basing it on Perplexity. This might include:

  • Participants each using their own methodology for choosing their vote.
  • Building in "personal" preferences such as were given to past bot participants
  • Adding a custom prompt and context from the discussion, such as "you just had this discussion, now it is time to cast your final vote"
  • Weights on reasons to vote for an answer - such as having the lowest Perplexity score, being the most factual, being the longest, aligning with specified values - which are then tallied for the final voting decision.
  • A permutation of multi-answer voting - such as "A & B" or "B, C & D"
  • Ranked choice voting
@NeonClary NeonClary added enhancement New feature or request triage New issue needs review labels Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request triage New issue needs review
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant