You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Enable complex voting mechanisms, somewhat under Admin level user control if possible.
Currently, bots each have a mechanism, and LLMs all use Perplexity. Enable further complexity and customization, especially for LLMs participants.
Initial Implementation Requirements
I imagine it's too early to map this out in detail. -Clary
Other Considerations
Once we have a robust discussion phase setup, we could add complexity to the voting process beyond simply basing it on Perplexity. This might include:
Participants each using their own methodology for choosing their vote.
Building in "personal" preferences such as were given to past bot participants
Adding a custom prompt and context from the discussion, such as "you just had this discussion, now it is time to cast your final vote"
Weights on reasons to vote for an answer - such as having the lowest Perplexity score, being the most factual, being the longest, aligning with specified values - which are then tallied for the final voting decision.
A permutation of multi-answer voting - such as "A & B" or "B, C & D"
Ranked choice voting
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Objective
Enable complex voting mechanisms, somewhat under Admin level user control if possible.
Currently, bots each have a mechanism, and LLMs all use Perplexity. Enable further complexity and customization, especially for LLMs participants.
Initial Implementation Requirements
I imagine it's too early to map this out in detail. -Clary
Other Considerations
Once we have a robust discussion phase setup, we could add complexity to the voting process beyond simply basing it on Perplexity. This might include:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: