You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The sculpted debt (DSCR) method with the Maximum debt fraction checkbox enabled creates unexpected results and should be used with care (if at all) because it masks the effect of varying revenue on financial metrics.
Parametrics with sculpted debt (DSCR input) and Maximum debt fraction checkbox clear. These results show that you need a price of heat of between about 16 and 18 $/MMBtu for reasonable financial returns. Anything less does not earn sufficient revenue to cover costs and anything more results in unreasonably high returns. For those of us used to cents/kWh, that's a range between 5 and 7 cents/kWh.
Note that for price of heat bewteen 8 and 10 $/MMBtu, the debt percent is negative. However, when Maximum debt fraction is checked with a value of 60% maximum debt fraction, the debt percent is zero, so that constraint is somehow affecting results when revenue is insufficient to cover the cost of debt.
From @taylorbrown75
I was running the IPH tower single owner model and noticed strange behavior related to the ppa_price on the Revenues page.
If you set the price to $10/MMBtu, the calculated LCOH is negative, and the IRR is close to 300%.
However, if you set the price lower or higher than $10, the results seem to behave normally.
Below is a table of parametric results, with the default IPH tower single owner case where I varied the ppa price from 8-30 $/MMBtu.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: