Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IPH Single Owner with 10$/MMBtu strange behavior #1924

Open
sjanzou opened this issue Nov 22, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

IPH Single Owner with 10$/MMBtu strange behavior #1924

sjanzou opened this issue Nov 22, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
financial Financial model

Comments

@sjanzou
Copy link
Collaborator

sjanzou commented Nov 22, 2024

From @taylorbrown75

I was running the IPH tower single owner model and noticed strange behavior related to the ppa_price on the Revenues page.

If you set the price to $10/MMBtu, the calculated LCOH is negative, and the IRR is close to 300%.

However, if you set the price lower or higher than $10, the results seem to behave normally.

Below is a table of parametric results, with the default IPH tower single owner case where I varied the ppa price from 8-30 $/MMBtu.

image

image

@sjanzou sjanzou added the bug label Nov 22, 2024
@sjanzou sjanzou added financial Financial model and removed bug labels Nov 22, 2024
@sjanzou
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sjanzou commented Nov 22, 2024

@taylorbrown75, this is actually a DSCR sculpted debt artifact.

If you run the parametrics with 50% debt instead of a DSCR of 1.3
image

You get the "expected" results:
image

In the default case (DSCR = 1.3) with the parametric runs,
image

If you look at the suspect $10/MMBtu case in detail (right click on row header - "3" in the case shown and select "Create new case"
image

You can run and examine the suspect $10/MMBtu case in detail
image

Also, when running the case, you get the simulation messages
image

And then examination of the Cash flow, shows the suspect "Debt principal payment" line
image

Which leads to the suspect cash flow after tax graph on the "Summary" results page
image

In summary, if you run in DSCR more for the debt, always be suspect of 0% "Debt percent" reported in the metrics table
image

@cpaulgilman - anything to add?

@sjanzou
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sjanzou commented Nov 22, 2024

SAM project file used to create the aforementioned results...
SAM_1924.zip

@cpaulgilman
Copy link
Collaborator

cpaulgilman commented Nov 22, 2024

The sculpted debt (DSCR) method with the Maximum debt fraction checkbox enabled creates unexpected results and should be used with care (if at all) because it masks the effect of varying revenue on financial metrics.

Parametrics with sculpted debt (DSCR input) and Maximum debt fraction checkbox clear. These results show that you need a price of heat of between about 16 and 18 $/MMBtu for reasonable financial returns. Anything less does not earn sufficient revenue to cover costs and anything more results in unreasonably high returns. For those of us used to cents/kWh, that's a range between 5 and 7 cents/kWh.

image

Note that for price of heat bewteen 8 and 10 $/MMBtu, the debt percent is negative. However, when Maximum debt fraction is checked with a value of 60% maximum debt fraction, the debt percent is zero, so that constraint is somehow affecting results when revenue is insufficient to cover the cost of debt.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
financial Financial model
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants