Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VRF FluidTCtrl model OU Fan power has negative values #10647

Open
1 of 3 tasks
yujiex opened this issue Aug 8, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #10649
Open
1 of 3 tasks

VRF FluidTCtrl model OU Fan power has negative values #10647

yujiex opened this issue Aug 8, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #10649
Assignees
Labels
Defect Includes code to repair a defect in EnergyPlus

Comments

@yujiex
Copy link
Collaborator

yujiex commented Aug 8, 2024

Issue overview

(updated below) Outdoor Unit Fan Power is negative sometimes running annual simulation of the model.
The following is when it's run with Atlanta weather file
image
The following is when it's run with Miami weather file
image

Defect files

fan negative power defect files.zip

Details

Some additional details for this issue (if relevant):

  • Platform (Mac, version)
  • Version of EnergyPlus (24.2)
  • Unmethours link or helpdesk ticket number

Checklist

Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.

  • Defect file added (list location of defect file here)
  • Ticket added to EnergyPlus Defect Complexity (Github Project)
  • Pull request created (the pull request will have additional tasks related to reviewing changes that fix this defect)
@yujiex yujiex self-assigned this Aug 8, 2024
@yujiex yujiex added the Defect Includes code to repair a defect in EnergyPlus label Aug 8, 2024
@yujiex yujiex linked a pull request Aug 8, 2024 that will close this issue
20 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Defect Includes code to repair a defect in EnergyPlus
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant