-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
who's developing NIF 2.1 and where? (Provenance and Confidence) #1
Comments
Just noticed that this proposal also disregards the direct props that exist in ITSRDF, eg:
|
Totally agreeing with that. Followed your suggestions, added notes about not using the trackers in the |
In line with the issue tracker policy suggested I will quote that concern in the |
@neradis Could you please try to use https://github-issue-mover.appspot.com/ to "move" all open issues to ontologies? There's no "move" operation on github, but it makes a copy, closes the original and makes a link. Got this tool from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9720718/how-do-i-move-an-issue-on-github-to-another-repo, which mislav/hub#886 calls "a fount of knowledge" on the topic. |
The Provenance and Confidence in NIF 2.1 proposal (http://nif.readthedocs.org/en/2.1-rc/prov-and-conf.html):
I wrote in NLP2RDF/specification#2 that I don't like that NIF+Stanbol uses completely different properties for "multiple annotations": the current proposal is better in this regard.
Can we have some assurance that the first link above will be the future NIF 2.1? We'd like to know this for sure before we make mega-tons of RDF in the Multisensor project.
There are several repos and thus several trackers under https://github.com/NLP2RDF (ontologies, specification, documentation), which is really bad, as I asked in NLP2RDF/ontologies#12.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: