You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently on the main branch, if we are having a patch that is below some minimum threshold area there is a possibility that we could merge patches with different landuse types (e.g. secondary into primary). Adding in landuse transitions (from #1040) could potentially exacerbate this case. Talking with @rgknox and @ckoven, we agreed that we should review terminate_patches and come up with ways to rework this to be a little more circumspect about if and how we merge disparate land use types patches.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently on the
main
branch, if we are having a patch that is below some minimum threshold area there is a possibility that we could merge patches with different landuse types (e.g. secondary into primary). Adding in landuse transitions (from #1040) could potentially exacerbate this case. Talking with @rgknox and @ckoven, we agreed that we should reviewterminate_patches
and come up with ways to rework this to be a little more circumspect about if and how we merge disparate land use types patches.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: