Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhanced Renaming #1431

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 30, 2016
Merged

Enhanced Renaming #1431

merged 7 commits into from
Jul 30, 2016

Conversation

Ryuichiro
Copy link

@Ryuichiro Ryuichiro commented Jul 30, 2016

  1. The bot won't rename favorites.
  2. Instead of "RenameAboveIv" you now have
    "RenamePokemon" which renames all pokemon not transfered and
    "RenameOnlyAboveIv" which skips pokemon with less than
    KeepMinIvPercentage IV.

With both true you have the old behavior.
"RenameOnlyAboveIv" alone will do nothing.

I think it's easier to maintain and extend than #1416

Now the Bot will snipe until he's out of pokeballs and tell you why he
stopped or didn't start.

I never worked with CancellationToken so please double check the code.
Added MinPokeballsWhileSnipe which takes place of the old
MinPokeballsToSnipe.

The Bot will end sniping if you have only inPokeballsWhileSnipe
pokeballs left.
1. The bot won't rename favorites.
2. Instead of "RenameAboveIv" you now have
"RenamePokemon" which renames all pokemon not transfered and
"RenameOnlyAboveIv" which skips pokemon with less than
KeepMinIvPercentage IV.

With both true you have the old behavior.
"RenameOnlyAboveIv" alone will do nothing.
@bjornegrim
Copy link
Contributor

perfect, thanks!

@NecronomiconCoding NecronomiconCoding merged commit dd82ec5 into NecronomiconCoding:master Jul 30, 2016
@Ryuichiro Ryuichiro deleted the RenameKeptPokemon branch July 30, 2016 16:27
schnapster pushed a commit to schnapster/NecroBot that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants