Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Revised expected column to more columns/options to support MVP2 and more complex ranking/benchmarks #18

Open
jh111 opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Revised expected column to more columns/options to support MVP2 and more complex ranking/benchmarks #18

jh111 opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@jh111 @maximusunc

Comments

@jh111
Copy link
Collaborator

jh111 commented May 29, 2024

Currently we go from 2_Acceptable to 3_Bad_But_Forgivable. However, there are also answers that just aren't relevant. They aren't bad, but they also aren't related to mechanism. We can consider have two columns for (evidence for correct Y/N) and (potential useful Y/N).
@jh111 jh111 changed the title Consider another category 3_No_evidence_of_relevance Revised expected column to more columns/options to support MVP2 and more complex ranking/benchmarks Jun 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jh111 jh111

@maximusunc maximusunc

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jh111 @maximusunc