You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As noted in the now closed issue #398 (and the current supporting_publications_specification) - we are currently allowing use of the publications edge property to capture CURIEs for clinical trials that support a given edge. But there was consensus that we will eventually want a separate dedicated property for referencing supporting trails (something like supporting_studies) .
Details/discussion to date can be found in comments on #398 which is now closed - so all further discussion can happen here. We will address this post Sept release, and update the spec and Biolink models accordingly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As noted in the now closed issue #398 (and the current supporting_publications_specification) - we are currently allowing use of the
publications
edge property to capture CURIEs for clinical trials that support a given edge. But there was consensus that we will eventually want a separate dedicated property for referencing supporting trails (something likesupporting_studies
) .Details/discussion to date can be found in comments on #398 which is now closed - so all further discussion can happen here. We will address this post Sept release, and update the spec and Biolink models accordingly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: