Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I want to be able to see the evidence that estrogens *treat* Feingold Syndrome by clicking on a link and then seeing a summary and links to pub med articles. The NLP team at Stanford was working on a way to do this at one point. #36

Closed
TranslatorIssueCreator opened this issue Oct 30, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
EPC O&O issue ordering & organizing issue

Comments

@TranslatorIssueCreator
Copy link

Type: Suggestion

URL: http://transltr-bma-ui-dev.ncats.io/results?loading=true

ARS PK: 0bd35de4-4a73-4bce-b94a-0582c8920c18

Steps to reproduce:

Screenshots:

@sierra-moxon
Copy link
Member

Trying to reproduce:

  • The first three fastest results returned do include "Estrogens, conjugated synthetic a" which may or may not be equivalent in this feedback to "estrogens" and I do see evidence with PubMed associations listed.

  • When the rest of the results are returned, this result is however pushed far below 60 results (I paged through 3, 20 results sets to try and find it again but stopped at 60).

It's not clear to me if this feedback means that "estrogen" should be first on the list of results (and it wasn't because it was pushed too far below the "fold" of the page), or if "estrogens" the role should be returned rather than a specific estrogen, or if there was a problem with the UI.

If anyone remembers submitting this issue, could you help clarify? :)

@sierra-moxon sierra-moxon added the O&O issue ordering & organizing issue label Nov 18, 2022
@sstemann sstemann added the EPC label Mar 9, 2023
@sstemann
Copy link

sstemann commented Mar 9, 2023

@sierra-moxon i'm not getting estrogen from CI, but of the results we are getting only about4 of 493 have 0 evidence. I think we have a pretty good awareness of gaps in the evidence and i dont think this ticket is adding any value right now and suggest closing it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
EPC O&O issue ordering & organizing issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants