You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are doing "history" and "ssp370", but not quite, because our identifiers will not be from the same stable as the parent (i.e. our variant_label is from a different vocabulary).
We could use those as is, but change the mip-era or parent_id?
We also have to decide whether we want to have two sets of experiments with different attributes, e.g. historical to 2015 and ssp370 thereafter.
Whatever we do, we probably need a formal es-doc definition which describes our initialisation and duration. It might be easier then to use neither historical nor ssp370, and simply call it canari, which can then have it's own document.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We are doing "history" and "ssp370", but not quite, because our identifiers will not be from the same stable as the parent (i.e. our
variant_label
is from a different vocabulary).We could use those as is, but change the
mip-era
orparent_id
?We also have to decide whether we want to have two sets of experiments with different attributes, e.g.
historical
to 2015 andssp370
thereafter.Whatever we do, we probably need a formal es-doc definition which describes our initialisation and duration. It might be easier then to use neither
historical
norssp370
, and simply call itcanari
, which can then have it's own document.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: