You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Xarray implemented polyfit and polyval on: pydata/xarray#3733
Should the duplicate functionality in geocat.comp.ndpolyfit be preserved?
To start the discussions:
Pros: maintains backward compatibility for all projects.
Cons: functionally with current polyfit in pydata.xarray is duplicated, and pydata.polyfit should become the reference implementation now that it has been moved upstream.
Potential resolution: refactor geocat.comp.ndpolyfit as an alias to pydata.xarrray.polyfit. this preserves compatibility with code that calls comp.ndpolyfit, while allowing xarray.polyfit to be the implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Resolution: refactor geocat.comp.ndpolyfit as an alias to pydata.xarrray.polyfit. this preserves compatibility with code that calls comp.ndpolyfit, while allowing xarray.polyfit to be the implementation.
tag with branch once this imporovement is started.
Xarray implemented polyfit and polyval on: pydata/xarray#3733
Should the duplicate functionality in geocat.comp.ndpolyfit be preserved?
To start the discussions:
Pros: maintains backward compatibility for all projects.
Cons: functionally with current polyfit in pydata.xarray is duplicated, and pydata.polyfit should become the reference implementation now that it has been moved upstream.
Potential resolution: refactor geocat.comp.ndpolyfit as an alias to pydata.xarrray.polyfit. this preserves compatibility with code that calls comp.ndpolyfit, while allowing xarray.polyfit to be the implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: