We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Yes - I've already checked
When I did search for PDS DOIs on dataCite, some descriptions are missing.
For example: https://api.datacite.org/works/10.17189/1518928 (PDS4 standard) or https://api.datacite.org/works/10.17189/1520273 (for this one the abstract is actually null in our database)
But this one works https://api.datacite.org/works/10.17189/f00x-qf27
I expected to have a description for all the dataset.
...
No response
🦄 #xyz
Given When I perform Then I expect
This impacts the discoverability of the datasets on ADS.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jordanpadams
No branches or pull requests
Checked for duplicates
Yes - I've already checked
🐛 Describe the bug
When I did search for PDS DOIs on dataCite, some descriptions are missing.
For example:
https://api.datacite.org/works/10.17189/1518928 (PDS4 standard)
or
https://api.datacite.org/works/10.17189/1520273 (for this one the abstract is actually null in our database)
But this one works https://api.datacite.org/works/10.17189/f00x-qf27
🕵️ Expected behavior
I expected to have a description for all the dataset.
📜 To Reproduce
...
🖥 Environment Info
...
📚 Version of Software Used
No response
🩺 Test Data / Additional context
No response
🦄 Related requirements
🦄 #xyz
Acceptance Criteria
Given
When I perform
Then I expect
⚙️ Engineering Details
No response
🎉 Integration & Test
This impacts the discoverability of the datasets on ADS.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: