Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

57.0 Update Addons #458

Closed
JDsnyke opened this issue Mar 3, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed

57.0 Update Addons #458

JDsnyke opened this issue Mar 3, 2018 · 7 comments

Comments

@JDsnyke
Copy link

JDsnyke commented Mar 3, 2018

Hello,

When can we expect the 57.0 update to drop? Most of the interesting firefox addons require this version at the least. Perhaps a roadmap to showcase upcoming features?

Loving WaterFox by the way

Thanks!

@hawkeye116477
Copy link
Contributor

hawkeye116477 commented Mar 3, 2018

There will be no 57.0 version. Next mayor version will be 60.

@grahamperrin
Copy link

Please subscribe to:

… roadmap …

Please see yesterday's Waterfox's current status …

@thebunnyrules
Copy link

Oh wow, so he's decided to go with Quantum after all?

@MrAlex94
Copy link
Collaborator

MrAlex94 commented Mar 3, 2018

You can use extensions for 57, the WebExtension API was already mature in 56. I’ll just add a UA override in the next release so you can install without issues.

@thebunnyrules, kind of. Obviously compatibility and XUL/XPCOM support is the big idea so if it doesn’t work then the 56 base will remain.

@laniakea64
Copy link

laniakea64 commented Mar 3, 2018

You can use extensions for 57, ... I’ll just add a UA override in the next release so you can install without issues.

Does this mean Waterfox will support the WebExtensions APIs introduced in 57 (e.g. webRequest.filterResponseData) in the next release?

Edit: This question was answered in #484 (comment)

@JDsnyke
Copy link
Author

JDsnyke commented Mar 4, 2018

Thanks for the replies everyone! Looking forward to the UA override @MrAlex94 !

@JDsnyke JDsnyke closed this as completed Mar 4, 2018
@thebunnyrules
Copy link

@MrAlex94 Best of luck with that. It certainly would be nice to have XPCOM/XUL support and the speed of the new Quantum architecture but I imagine that as Moz moves further and further into WebExtensions, you're going to have to put in more work to support both standards.

I'm almost done making a telemetry free FF that's in the same spirit as WF but for Quantum. If you end up seeing that supporting Quantum is untenable, I can probably put it up as it's own project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants