Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue-comments: strikethrough applied filter names #59

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 5, 2018
Merged

Conversation

darkred
Copy link
Collaborator

@darkred darkred commented Oct 3, 2018

Better distinguish the filters that are being applied, by using a strike-through on the applied filter names.

I hope you like my suggestion, @Mottie 🙂

Animated screen capture comparison:

Currently:

12345

My suggested change:

12345

Better distinguish the filters that are being applied
by using a strikethrough on the relevant applied filter name.
@darkred darkred changed the title Issue-comments: use a strikethrough on the applied filter names Issue-comments: strikethrough applied filter names Oct 3, 2018
@Mottie
Copy link
Owner

Mottie commented Oct 4, 2018

Thanks @darkred!

I had a busy day, I'll try to look at this tomorrow.

- Fixed the selector to also apply to applied filters that have no content.
- Also, changed the position of the rule, to maintain the existing order of the CSS rules
@darkred
Copy link
Collaborator Author

darkred commented Oct 4, 2018

I've just fixed the selector I use in my PR, to also apply to the applied filters that have no content.

@Mottie Mottie merged commit ea02975 into master Oct 5, 2018
@Mottie
Copy link
Owner

Mottie commented Oct 5, 2018

Ok, this looks like a nice addition. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants