Merge working tree into master #30
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request involves the deletion of several files related to Flutter and Dart project configurations, including plugin registrants and package configurations. Additionally, it introduces new files for managing order and payment functionalities using the BLoC pattern, enhancing state management in the application. The changes also include updates to import paths and the structure of various classes, particularly in the context of user authentication and order processing. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (127)
lib/presentation/payment_qr/bloc/payment_qr_event.dart (1)
3-12: 💡 Codebase verification
Events are registered but handlers are empty
The bloc has the correct structure with both events properly registered, but the handlers are incomplete:
_onLoadPaymentQr: Empty implementation with TODO comment_onOpenWallet: Empty implementation with TODO commentBoth handlers need to be implemented to emit appropriate states and handle the business logic.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify event handling in PaymentQrBloc
Let's ensure these events are properly handled in the corresponding bloc implementation.
Missing implementation for both event handlers in PaymentQrBloc
The verification reveals that both event handlers have TODO comments and lack proper implementation:
LoadPaymentQrhandler: Contains TODO comment "Implementar lógica para cargar el QR de pago"OpenWallethandler: Contains TODO comment "Implementar lógica para abrir la wallet"Let me verify the actual bloc structure to provide more specific details:
Let me check the actual handler implementations:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if all events are handled in the bloc file # Expected: Find event handling for both LoadPaymentQr and OpenWallet echo "Checking PaymentQrBloc implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'on<LoadPaymentQr>($$$)' || echo "LoadPaymentQr handler not found" ast-grep --pattern 'on<OpenWallet>($$$)' || echo "OpenWallet handler not found" # Also check for any TODOs or unimplemented handlers rg "TODO|FIXME|unimplemented" "lib/presentation/payment_qr/bloc/"Length of output: 464
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the full bloc implementation to see the structure rg -A 5 "class PaymentQrBloc" lib/presentation/payment_qr/bloc/payment_qr_bloc.dartLength of output: 281
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the handler implementations rg -A 5 "_onLoadPaymentQr|_onOpenWallet" lib/presentation/payment_qr/bloc/payment_qr_bloc.dartLength of output: 447
lib/data/models/chat_model.dart (3)
1-6: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing the model with additional functionality and documentation.
While the properties are well-defined and appropriately marked as final, consider the following improvements:
- Add class-level documentation explaining the purpose and usage
- Implement
toString(),==, andhashCodefor proper object comparison- Add a
copyWith()method for immutable updatesHere's a suggested implementation:
/// Represents a chat conversation with basic metadata. /// /// Used to display chat previews in the chat list screen. class ChatModel { final String id; final String username; final String lastMessage; final String timeAgo; final bool isUnread; @override String toString() => 'ChatModel(id: $id, username: $username, lastMessage: $lastMessage, timeAgo: $timeAgo, isUnread: $isUnread)'; @override bool operator ==(Object other) => identical(this, other) || other is ChatModel && runtimeType == other.runtimeType && id == other.id && username == other.username && lastMessage == other.lastMessage && timeAgo == other.timeAgo && isUnread == other.isUnread; @override int get hashCode => Object.hash(id, username, lastMessage, timeAgo, isUnread); ChatModel copyWith({ String? id, String? username, String? lastMessage, String? timeAgo, bool? isUnread, }) => ChatModel( id: id ?? this.id, username: username ?? this.username, lastMessage: lastMessage ?? this.lastMessage, timeAgo: timeAgo ?? this.timeAgo, isUnread: isUnread ?? this.isUnread, );
8-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding input validation in the constructor.
While the constructor correctly marks required parameters, it should validate input to prevent empty or invalid data.
Here's a suggested implementation with validation:
ChatModel({ required this.id, required this.username, required this.lastMessage, required this.timeAgo, this.isUnread = false, }) : assert(id.isNotEmpty, 'id cannot be empty'), assert(username.isNotEmpty, 'username cannot be empty'), assert(lastMessage.isNotEmpty, 'lastMessage cannot be empty'), assert(timeAgo.isNotEmpty, 'timeAgo cannot be empty');
1-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding serialization support.
Since this is a data model likely used with APIs or local storage, consider adding JSON serialization support.
Here's a suggested implementation:
factory ChatModel.fromJson(Map<String, dynamic> json) => ChatModel( id: json['id'] as String, username: json['username'] as String, lastMessage: json['lastMessage'] as String, timeAgo: json['timeAgo'] as String, isUnread: json['isUnread'] as bool? ?? false, ); Map<String, dynamic> toJson() => { 'id': id, 'username': username, 'lastMessage': lastMessage, 'timeAgo': timeAgo, 'isUnread': isUnread, };lib/data/repositories/order_repository_interface.dart (2)
12-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding order filtering capabilities to getPendingOrders.
The stream of pending orders might benefit from filtering capabilities (e.g., by currency, amount range, or user). This would help reduce unnecessary data transfer and improve UI performance.
Consider modifying to:
Stream<OrderModel> getPendingOrders({ String? currency, double? minAmount, double? maxAmount, String? userId });
8-10: 💡 Codebase verification
Amount validation is needed in the order-taking flow
After reviewing the implementation, there's no validation for the amount parameter in either the repository or service layer. The amount is directly passed to the Nostr event without any checks. Consider:
- The amount parameter affects a financial transaction, so validation is crucial
- Currently, negative amounts, zero amounts, or amounts exceeding the order's available amount could be passed
- The implementation silently accepts null amounts without documenting the behavior
Recommended changes:
- Add validation in
MostroOrderRepositoryto ensure:
- Amount is positive when provided
- Amount doesn't exceed the original order's available amount
- Document whether null amount means "take full order" or is invalid
- Consider making amount required if partial orders aren't supported
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding amount validation for take order methods.
The optional amount parameter in
takeSellOrderandtakeBuyOrdershould probably have some validation constraints. Consider:
- Adding @required annotation if amount is actually required
- Documenting valid amount ranges
- Adding a separate method for partial order taking if that's the intention
Let's check if amount validation exists in the implementation:
Let's search for any amount-related validations or checks in the codebase:
Let's also check if there are any validation utilities or helpers:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for amount validation in order repository implementations rg -l "amount.*validate" --type dartLength of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for repository implementations fd "order.*repository.*dart" --type f # Then let's look for the implementation of these methods ast-grep --pattern 'takeSellOrder($$$) { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'takeBuyOrder($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 247
Script:
#!/bin/bash rg "amount" --type dart -B 2 -A 2Length of output: 9112
Script:
#!/bin/bash fd "valid.*dart" --type fLength of output: 27
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the implementation of MostroOrderRepository to see the full context cat lib/data/repositories/mostro_order_repository.dart # Let's also check the MostroService implementation cat lib/services/mostro_service.dart # Let's look for any validation or error handling patterns rg "throw|assert|check|valid" --type dart -B 2 -A 2Length of output: 12765
lib/presentation/widgets/order_list.dart (1)
10-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider handling empty state and error cases.
While the implementation is efficient using ListView.builder, consider adding:
- Empty state handling when orders list is empty
- Error boundaries for potential exceptions during rendering
Here's a suggested implementation:
@override Widget build(BuildContext context) { + if (orders.isEmpty) { + return const Center( + child: Text('No orders available'), + ); + } + return ListView.builder( itemCount: orders.length, itemBuilder: (context, index) { - return OrderListItem(order: orders[index]); + return ErrorBoundary( + child: OrderListItem(order: orders[index]), + onError: (error, stack) => ListTile( + title: Text('Error displaying order'), + subtitle: Text('Please try again later'), + ), + ); }, ); }Note: You'll need to implement the
ErrorBoundarywidget or use a package likeerror_boundaryfrom pub.dev.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
lib/presentation/order/bloc/order_details_event.dart (2)
11-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance null safety and documentation.
While the implementation is correct, consider these improvements for better maintainability and null safety:
+/// Event emitted when order details need to be loaded. class LoadOrderDetails extends OrderDetailsEvent { - final OrderModel order; + /// The order model containing details to be loaded. + final OrderModel order; - const LoadOrderDetails(this.order); + const LoadOrderDetails({required this.order});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// Event emitted when order details need to be loaded. class LoadOrderDetails extends OrderDetailsEvent { /// The order model containing details to be loaded. final OrderModel order; const LoadOrderDetails({required this.order}); @override List<Object> get props => [order]; }
4-22: 💡 Codebase verification
Events are properly registered but handlers need implementation
The BLoC correctly registers handlers for all defined events (
LoadOrderDetails,CancelOrder, andContinueOrder), but there are implementation concerns:
_onLoadOrderDetails: Properly implemented with state updates_onCancelOrder: Contains only a print statement, missing actual cancellation logic_onContinueOrder: Contains only a print statement, missing order continuation logic🔗 Analysis chain
Verify event handling in OrderDetailsBloc.
Let's ensure these events are properly handled in the corresponding BLoC implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all events are handled in the OrderDetailsBloc # Search for the OrderDetailsBloc implementation and its event handling ast-grep --pattern 'class OrderDetailsBloc extends Bloc<OrderDetailsEvent, $_> { $$$ on<LoadOrderDetails>($_) { $$$ } $$$ on<CancelOrder>($_) { $$$ } $$$ on<ContinueOrder>($_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 224
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to find the OrderDetailsBloc implementation # First, find the file containing OrderDetailsBloc fd "order_details_bloc.dart" # Then let's use ripgrep to look at its implementation rg "class OrderDetailsBloc" -A 30Length of output: 2274
lib/presentation/chat_detail/bloc/chat_detail_event.dart (1)
19-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add message validation and documentation.
The current implementation allows empty messages. Consider adding validation and documentation:
class SendMessage extends ChatDetailEvent { + /// The message content to be sent in the chat. + /// Must not be empty or contain only whitespace. final String message; - const SendMessage(this.message); + const SendMessage(this.message) { + if (message.trim().isEmpty) { + throw ArgumentError('Message cannot be empty or contain only whitespace'); + } + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.class SendMessage extends ChatDetailEvent { /// The message content to be sent in the chat. /// Must not be empty or contain only whitespace. final String message; const SendMessage(this.message) { if (message.trim().isEmpty) { throw ArgumentError('Message cannot be empty or contain only whitespace'); } } @override List<Object> get props => [message]; }lib/presentation/payment_qr/bloc/payment_qr_bloc.dart (1)
6-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling and logging.
While the event registration is correct, consider adding error handling and logging to improve maintainability and debugging:
class PaymentQrBloc extends Bloc<PaymentQrEvent, PaymentQrState> { PaymentQrBloc() : super(PaymentQrInitial()) { - on<LoadPaymentQr>(_onLoadPaymentQr); - on<OpenWallet>(_onOpenWallet); + on<LoadPaymentQr>(_onLoadPaymentQr, + transformer: (events, mapper) => events.asyncExpand(mapper).doOnError( + (error, stackTrace) { + // Log error + emit(PaymentQrError(error.toString())); + } + ) + ); + on<OpenWallet>(_onOpenWallet, + transformer: (events, mapper) => events.asyncExpand(mapper).doOnError( + (error, stackTrace) { + // Log error + emit(PaymentQrError(error.toString())); + } + ) + ); }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
lib/presentation/chat_detail/bloc/chat_detail_bloc.dart (1)
11-13:
⚠️ Potential issueImplementation needed for event handlers with proper error handling.
Both event handlers are currently empty. Consider implementing:
- Proper state transitions (Loading → Success/Error)
- Error handling with try-catch blocks
- Emit appropriate states based on the operation results
Also, the TODO comments should be in English for consistency.
Here's a suggested implementation structure:
- void _onLoadChatDetail(LoadChatDetail event, Emitter<ChatDetailState> emit) { - //TODO: Implementar lógica para cargar los detalles del chat + Future<void> _onLoadChatDetail(LoadChatDetail event, Emitter<ChatDetailState> emit) async { + try { + emit(ChatDetailLoading()); + // TODO: Implement chat detail loading logic + // final chatDetails = await yourRepository.getChatDetails(event.chatId); + // emit(ChatDetailLoaded(chatDetails)); + } catch (error) { + emit(ChatDetailError(error.toString())); + } } - void _onSendMessage(SendMessage event, Emitter<ChatDetailState> emit) { - //TODO: Implementar lógica para enviar un mensaje + Future<void> _onSendMessage(SendMessage event, Emitter<ChatDetailState> emit) async { + try { + // TODO: Implement message sending logic + // await yourRepository.sendMessage(event.message); + // emit(MessageSent()); + } catch (error) { + emit(ChatDetailError(error.toString())); + } }Also applies to: 15-17
lib/presentation/add_order/bloc/add_order_bloc.dart (2)
6-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling and logging.
The event registration looks good, but consider adding error handling to catch and properly handle any exceptions that might occur during event processing.
AddOrderBloc() : super(const AddOrderState()) { - on<ChangeOrderType>(_onChangeOrderType); - on<SubmitOrder>(_onSubmitOrder); + on<ChangeOrderType>((event, emit) async { + try { + await _onChangeOrderType(event, emit); + } catch (e, stackTrace) { + emit(state.copyWith(status: AddOrderStatus.failure)); + // Consider adding proper error logging here + } + }); + on<SubmitOrder>((event, emit) async { + try { + await _onSubmitOrder(event, emit); + } catch (e, stackTrace) { + emit(state.copyWith(status: AddOrderStatus.failure)); + // Consider adding proper error logging here + } + }); }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
15-18: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueThe review comment is correct. Order repository implementation exists but is not integrated.
The codebase has a well-defined
OrderRepositoryinterface and a concreteMostroOrderRepositoryimplementation with acreateOrdermethod, but theAddOrderBlocis not utilizing it. The suggested changes in the review comment are appropriate because:
- The repository exists and provides the necessary functionality via
createOrder(OrderModel order)- The
AddOrderBloccurrently lacks the repository dependency and proper error handling- The suggested async implementation with validation and error states aligns with the codebase architecture
Required changes:
- Inject
OrderRepositoryintoAddOrderBloc- Implement order validation
- Use
createOrderfrom the repository- Handle async operations and potential errors as suggested
🔗 Analysis chain
Implement the submit order functionality.
The current implementation is incomplete and only emits a success state. The method should:
- Validate the order data
- Interact with a repository to persist the order
- Handle potential failures
- void _onSubmitOrder(SubmitOrder event, Emitter<AddOrderState> emit) { - // For now, just emit a success state - emit(state.copyWith(status: AddOrderStatus.success)); + Future<void> _onSubmitOrder(SubmitOrder event, Emitter<AddOrderState> emit) async { + try { + emit(state.copyWith(status: AddOrderStatus.loading)); + + if (!_validateOrder(state)) { + emit(state.copyWith(status: AddOrderStatus.invalid)); + return; + } + + // TODO: Implement order submission logic + // await _orderRepository.submitOrder(state.toOrder()); + + emit(state.copyWith(status: AddOrderStatus.success)); + } catch (e) { + emit(state.copyWith(status: AddOrderStatus.failure)); + } }Let's check if there's an order repository implementation:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for order repository implementation ast-grep --pattern 'class $_Repository { $$$ submitOrder($_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search for repository classes and order-related methods rg -l "Repository" --type dart # Also search for any order-related repository or service files fd -e dart . | grep -i "order.*repository\|repository.*order" # Search for any order submission related code rg -i "submit.*order|order.*submit" --type dartLength of output: 878
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the implementation of the order repository interface and its concrete implementation cat lib/data/repositories/order_repository_interface.dart cat lib/data/repositories/mostro_order_repository.dart # Also check if the AddOrderBloc has any repository dependency rg -A 5 "class AddOrderBloc" lib/presentation/add_order/bloc/add_order_bloc.dartLength of output: 2106
lib/presentation/payment_qr/bloc/payment_qr_state.dart (2)
24-31: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling in PaymentQrError state.
Consider these improvements:
- Use a more specific error type or custom exception class
- Add validation for the error message
- Add documentation
Consider this implementation:
+/// State representing an error in QR code generation or processing. class PaymentQrError extends PaymentQrState { - final String error; + /// The error that occurred. Consider using a custom exception type + /// for more specific error handling. + final Object error; - const PaymentQrError(this.error); + const PaymentQrError(this.error) { + assert(error != null, 'Error cannot be null'); + } @override List<Object> get props => [error]; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// State representing an error in QR code generation or processing. class PaymentQrError extends PaymentQrState { /// The error that occurred. Consider using a custom exception type /// for more specific error handling. final Object error; const PaymentQrError(this.error) { assert(error != null, 'Error cannot be null'); } @override List<Object> get props => [error]; }
14-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving the PaymentQrLoaded state implementation.
Several improvements could make this class more robust:
- Consider using
DateTimeforexpiresIninstead ofStringto properly handle expiration- Add validation for the input parameters
- Add documentation for the fields
Consider this implementation:
+/// State representing a successfully generated QR code. class PaymentQrLoaded extends PaymentQrState { + /// The QR code data to be displayed final String qrData; - final String expiresIn; + /// When the QR code expires + final DateTime expiresIn; - const PaymentQrLoaded(this.qrData, this.expiresIn); + const PaymentQrLoaded(this.qrData, this.expiresIn) { + assert(qrData.isNotEmpty, 'QR data cannot be empty'); + assert(expiresIn.isAfter(DateTime.now()), 'Expiration must be in the future'); + } @override List<Object> get props => [qrData, expiresIn]; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// State representing a successfully generated QR code. class PaymentQrLoaded extends PaymentQrState { /// The QR code data to be displayed final String qrData; /// When the QR code expires final DateTime expiresIn; const PaymentQrLoaded(this.qrData, this.expiresIn) { assert(qrData.isNotEmpty, 'QR data cannot be empty'); assert(expiresIn.isAfter(DateTime.now()), 'Expiration must be in the future'); } @override List<Object> get props => [qrData, expiresIn]; }lib/core/utils/biometrics_helper.dart (1)
12-25: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueBased on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Revise error handling approach and maintain consistency with existing patterns
The suggested changes need revision:
- The codebase already uses the
loggingpackage, but it's only utilized inNostrService. Instead of introducing a new logging pattern, this method should follow the established pattern.- There's no evidence of
AppLocalizationssetup in the codebase, so we shouldn't introduce it without the proper infrastructure.- The additional authentication options (
useErrorDialogs,sensitiveTransaction) aren't necessary as the current implementation aligns with the app's usage patterns.Here's the revised suggestion:
+ /// Authenticates the user using biometric authentication. + /// Returns true if authentication was successful, false otherwise. Future<bool> authenticateWithBiometrics() async { + final _logger = Logger('BiometricsHelper'); try { return await _localAuth.authenticate( localizedReason: 'Authenticate to access the app', options: const AuthenticationOptions( stickyAuth: true, biometricOnly: true, ), ); } catch (e) { - print(e); + _logger.severe('Biometric authentication failed', e); return false; } }🔗 Analysis chain
Enhance error handling and add documentation.
Several improvements are recommended:
- Replace print statement with proper logging
- Externalize the localized reason string for internationalization
- Add method documentation
- Consider adding a timeout for the authentication prompt
Here's the suggested implementation:
+ /// Authenticates the user using biometric authentication. + /// Returns true if authentication was successful, false otherwise. + /// The authentication prompt will be shown with a localized reason message. Future<bool> authenticateWithBiometrics() async { try { return await _localAuth.authenticate( - localizedReason: 'Authenticate to access the app', + localizedReason: AppLocalizations.of(context).authenticatePrompt, options: const AuthenticationOptions( stickyAuth: true, biometricOnly: true, + useErrorDialogs: true, + sensitiveTransaction: true, ), ); } catch (e) { - print(e); + log.error('Biometric authentication failed', error: e); return false; } }Let's verify if the logging utility is available:
Let me check for the localization setup and any existing biometric-related strings.
Let me check for any existing biometric-related code and error handling patterns in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for logging utility imports and implementations rg -g '!*.lock' -g '!*.yaml' "import.*logging|logger"Length of output: 821
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for localization setup and strings rg -g '!*.lock' "AppLocalizations|authenticatePrompt" # Check for any existing biometric-related strings in l10n or translations fd -e arb . | xargs catLength of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for biometric-related code and error handling patterns rg -g '!*.lock' "local_auth|biometric" -A 3 -B 3 # Check for common error handling patterns in Dart files ast-grep --pattern 'try { $$$ } catch ($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 9830
lib/core/config.dart (2)
19-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making the timeout duration configurable.
The 30-second timeout is hardcoded. Consider making this configurable based on the environment (debug/release) or through environment variables.
static const Duration defaultNostrConnectionTimeout = Duration(seconds: 30); static Duration get nostrConnectionTimeout => const String.fromEnvironment('NOSTR_TIMEOUT_SECONDS').isNotEmpty ? Duration(seconds: int.parse(const String.fromEnvironment('NOSTR_TIMEOUT_SECONDS'))) : defaultNostrConnectionTimeout;
16-17:
⚠️ Potential issueFix the Mostro public key format.
The
mostroPubKeycontains a semicolon at the end which appears to be a typo and could cause issues when using this key.static const String mostroPubKey = - 'npub1n5yrh6lkvc0l3lcmcfwake4r3ex7jrm0e6lumsc22d8ylf7jwk0qack9tql;'; + 'npub1n5yrh6lkvc0l3lcmcfwake4r3ex7jrm0e6lumsc22d8ylf7jwk0qack9tql';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.static const String mostroPubKey = 'npub1n5yrh6lkvc0l3lcmcfwake4r3ex7jrm0e6lumsc22d8ylf7jwk0qack9tql';lib/presentation/payment_confirmation/bloc/payment_confirmation_state.dart (1)
23-30: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider implementing more structured error handling.
Using a String for error messages is flexible but lacks type safety and structure. Consider creating an enum or dedicated error types to handle specific error cases in a more maintainable way.
+/// Represents specific error cases that can occur during payment confirmation +enum PaymentConfirmationErrorType { + networkError, + insufficientFunds, + timeout, + unknown +} + class PaymentConfirmationError extends PaymentConfirmationState { - final String error; + final PaymentConfirmationErrorType type; + final String? message; - const PaymentConfirmationError(this.error); + const PaymentConfirmationError(this.type, [this.message]); @override - List<Object> get props => [error]; + List<Object> get props => [type, if (message != null) message!];Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
lib/presentation/chat_list/bloc/chat_list_state.dart (1)
4-4: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider additional chat-specific states.
While the current states cover the basic lifecycle, consider adding states for specific chat scenarios such as:
refreshing- When updating chat list while maintaining existing dataempty- When successfully loaded but no chats existdisconnected- When chat service connection is lostlib/presentation/order/bloc/order_details_state.dart (1)
17-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding state validation in copyWith.
While the implementation is correct, consider adding assertions to prevent invalid state combinations.
Example enhancement:
OrderDetailsState copyWith({ OrderDetailsStatus? status, OrderModel? order, String? errorMessage, }) { + assert( + status != OrderDetailsStatus.loaded || order != null, + 'Order cannot be null when status is loaded', + ); + assert( + status != OrderDetailsStatus.error || errorMessage != null, + 'Error message cannot be null when status is error', + ); return OrderDetailsState( status: status ?? this.status, order: order ?? this.order, errorMessage: errorMessage ?? this.errorMessage, ); }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
lib/presentation/add_order/bloc/add_order_state.dart (2)
17-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation in copyWith method.
The
copyWithmethod should ensure that setting an error message also sets the status to failure.AddOrderState copyWith({ OrderType? currentType, AddOrderStatus? status, String? errorMessage, }) { + if (errorMessage != null) { + status = AddOrderStatus.failure; + } return AddOrderState( currentType: currentType ?? this.currentType, status: status ?? this.status, errorMessage: errorMessage ?? this.errorMessage, ); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.AddOrderState copyWith({ OrderType? currentType, AddOrderStatus? status, String? errorMessage, }) { if (errorMessage != null) { status = AddOrderStatus.failure; } return AddOrderState( currentType: currentType ?? this.currentType, status: status ?? this.status, errorMessage: errorMessage ?? this.errorMessage, ); }
11-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add parameter validation in constructor.
Consider adding assertions to validate constructor parameters, especially for null checks and business rules.
const AddOrderState({ this.currentType = OrderType.sell, this.status = AddOrderStatus.initial, this.errorMessage, - }); + }) : assert( + errorMessage == null || status == AddOrderStatus.failure, + 'errorMessage should only be set when status is failure', + );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const AddOrderState({ this.currentType = OrderType.sell, this.status = AddOrderStatus.initial, this.errorMessage, }) : assert( errorMessage == null || status == AddOrderStatus.failure, 'errorMessage should only be set when status is failure', );lib/presentation/home/bloc/home_event.dart (1)
14-21: 💡 Codebase verification
Import
OrderTypefromhome_state.dartThe
OrderTypeenum is defined inlib/presentation/home/bloc/home_state.dartand needs to be imported in the file under review.Add this import:
import 'home_state.dart';🔗 Analysis chain
Verify OrderType enum definition.
The
OrderTypetype is used but its source is unclear after removing the unused home_state import.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for OrderType definition ast-grep --pattern 'enum OrderType { $$$ }' # Backup: Search for any OrderType reference rg "OrderType" -A 3Length of output: 8421
lib/presentation/add_order/bloc/add_order_event.dart (2)
20-37:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance type safety and validation for SubmitOrder event
- Consider using an enum for
paymentMethodinstead of String to prevent invalid values.- Add validation for financial values to prevent negative or zero amounts.
Here's a suggested implementation:
+/// Represents the available payment methods +enum PaymentMethod { + bankTransfer, + cash, + // Add other methods as needed +} class SubmitOrder extends AddOrderEvent { final String fiatCode; final double fiatAmount; final int satsAmount; - final String paymentMethod; + final PaymentMethod paymentMethod; final OrderType orderType; const SubmitOrder({ required this.fiatCode, required this.fiatAmount, required this.satsAmount, required this.paymentMethod, required this.orderType, - }); + }) : assert(fiatAmount > 0, 'Fiat amount must be positive'), + assert(satsAmount > 0, 'Sats amount must be positive');📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// Represents the available payment methods enum PaymentMethod { bankTransfer, cash, // Add other methods as needed } class SubmitOrder extends AddOrderEvent { final String fiatCode; final double fiatAmount; final int satsAmount; final PaymentMethod paymentMethod; final OrderType orderType; const SubmitOrder({ required this.fiatCode, required this.fiatAmount, required this.satsAmount, required this.paymentMethod, required this.orderType, }) : assert(fiatAmount > 0, 'Fiat amount must be positive'), assert(satsAmount > 0, 'Sats amount must be positive'); @override List<Object> get props => [fiatCode, fiatAmount, satsAmount, paymentMethod, orderType]; }
4-37: 💡 Codebase verification
Events are properly implemented but SubmitOrder handling needs attention
The events are correctly defined and integrated, but there are a few points that need attention:
- The
ChangeOrderTypeevent is properly handled in both the bloc and UI components- The
SubmitOrderevent handler is currently a stub that only updates status without processing the order data- While the event is defined with all necessary fields (fiatCode, fiatAmount, satsAmount, paymentMethod, orderType), there's no evidence of actual form submission in the UI
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify event handling implementation
Let's verify the proper implementation of these events in the corresponding BLoC and UI components.
Let me verify the state implementation and UI handling to ensure completeness.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for AddOrderBloc implementation and event handling echo "Searching for AddOrderBloc implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'class AddOrderBloc extends Bloc<AddOrderEvent, $_> { $$$ }' echo "\nSearching for event emissions in UI..." rg "add\((?:ChangeOrderType|SubmitOrder)\(" -A 3Length of output: 2393
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check AddOrderState implementation and UI state handling echo "Searching for AddOrderState implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'class AddOrderState extends Equatable { $$$ }' echo "\nSearching for state usage in UI..." rg "BlocBuilder<AddOrderBloc, AddOrderState>" -A 5 echo "\nSearching for form submission..." rg "SubmitOrder\(" -A 3Length of output: 3801
lib/presentation/profile/bloc/profile_bloc.dart (3)
19-19:
⚠️ Potential issueFix invalid Nostr public key format.
The hardcoded public key uses an invalid format. Nostr public keys should be 32 bytes of hex, not base32.
- pubkey: 'npub1qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq3xvmkv', + pubkey: '000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000',📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.pubkey: '000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000',
23-28: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling specificity.
The current error handling catches all exceptions and converts them to string. Consider handling specific exceptions and providing more meaningful error messages.
- } catch (e) { + } catch (e) { + final errorMessage = switch (e) { + FormatException() => 'Invalid profile data format', + TimeoutException() => 'Profile loading timed out', + _ => 'Failed to load profile: ${e.toString()}' + }; emit(state.copyWith( status: ProfileStatus.error, - errorMessage: e.toString(), + errorMessage: errorMessage, )); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.} catch (e) { final errorMessage = switch (e) { FormatException() => 'Invalid profile data format', TimeoutException() => 'Profile loading timed out', _ => 'Failed to load profile: ${e.toString()}' }; emit(state.copyWith( status: ProfileStatus.error, errorMessage: errorMessage, )); }
16-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract mock values as constants.
Consider extracting the hardcoded values as named constants for better maintainability and reusability in tests.
+ // Mock profile data for development + static const _mockUsername = 'SatoshiNakamoto'; + static const _mockPubkey = '000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000'; + static const _mockCompletedTrades = 42; + static const _mockRating = 4.8; + Future<void> _onLoadProfile(LoadProfile event, Emitter<ProfileState> emit) async { emit(state.copyWith( status: ProfileStatus.loaded, - username: 'SatoshiNakamoto', - pubkey: 'npub1qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq3xvmkv', - completedTrades: 42, - rating: 4.8, + username: _mockUsername, + pubkey: _mockPubkey, + completedTrades: _mockCompletedTrades, + rating: _mockRating, ));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Mock profile data for development static const _mockUsername = 'SatoshiNakamoto'; static const _mockPubkey = '000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000'; static const _mockCompletedTrades = 42; static const _mockRating = 4.8; emit(state.copyWith( status: ProfileStatus.loaded, username: _mockUsername, pubkey: _mockPubkey, completedTrades: _mockCompletedTrades, rating: _mockRating, ));lib/presentation/chat_detail/bloc/chat_detail_state.dart (3)
23-30: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing error handling with specific error types.
While the current implementation is functional, consider using a more structured approach to error handling. This could help in displaying appropriate error messages to users and handling different error scenarios differently.
class ChatDetailError extends ChatDetailState { - final String error; + final ChatDetailErrorType type; + final String message; - const ChatDetailError(this.error); + const ChatDetailError({ + required this.type, + required this.message, + }); @override - List<Object> get props => [error]; + List<Object> get props => [type, message]; } +enum ChatDetailErrorType { + network, + messageNotSent, + loadingFailed, + unknown, +}
32-44: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance the ChatMessage model with additional functionality.
The current implementation could benefit from several improvements to make it more robust and maintainable:
- Add Equatable for value comparison
- Add copyWith method for immutability
- Add JSON serialization
- Add toString for debugging
-class ChatMessage { +class ChatMessage extends Equatable { final String id; final String sender; final String content; final DateTime timestamp; - ChatMessage({ + const ChatMessage({ required this.id, required this.sender, required this.content, required this.timestamp, }); + @override + List<Object> get props => [id, sender, content, timestamp]; + + ChatMessage copyWith({ + String? id, + String? sender, + String? content, + DateTime? timestamp, + }) { + return ChatMessage( + id: id ?? this.id, + sender: sender ?? this.sender, + content: content ?? this.content, + timestamp: timestamp ?? this.timestamp, + ); + } + + Map<String, dynamic> toJson() => { + 'id': id, + 'sender': sender, + 'content': content, + 'timestamp': timestamp.toIso8601String(), + }; + + factory ChatMessage.fromJson(Map<String, dynamic> json) => ChatMessage( + id: json['id'] as String, + sender: json['sender'] as String, + content: json['content'] as String, + timestamp: DateTime.parse(json['timestamp'] as String), + ); + + @override + String toString() => 'ChatMessage(id: $id, sender: $sender, content: $content, timestamp: $timestamp)'; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.class ChatMessage extends Equatable { final String id; final String sender; final String content; final DateTime timestamp; const ChatMessage({ required this.id, required this.sender, required this.content, required this.timestamp, }); @override List<Object> get props => [id, sender, content, timestamp]; ChatMessage copyWith({ String? id, String? sender, String? content, DateTime? timestamp, }) { return ChatMessage( id: id ?? this.id, sender: sender ?? this.sender, content: content ?? this.content, timestamp: timestamp ?? this.timestamp, ); } Map<String, dynamic> toJson() => { 'id': id, 'sender': sender, 'content': content, 'timestamp': timestamp.toIso8601String(), }; factory ChatMessage.fromJson(Map<String, dynamic> json) => ChatMessage( id: json['id'] as String, sender: json['sender'] as String, content: json['content'] as String, timestamp: DateTime.parse(json['timestamp'] as String), ); @override String toString() => 'ChatMessage(id: $id, sender: $sender, content: $content, timestamp: $timestamp)'; }
1-44: 💡 Codebase verification
BLoC implementation needs completion
The BLoC pattern structure is correctly set up but the implementation is incomplete:
- The state and event classes are properly defined with Equatable integration
- BlocBuilder is correctly used in the UI for state management
- Event dispatching is implemented for sending messages
- However, both event handlers (_onLoadChatDetail and _onSendMessage) are empty with TODO comments
- No repository layer integration is found, which is needed for data handling
Key areas requiring implementation:
_onLoadChatDetailmethod in ChatDetailBloc_onSendMessagemethod in ChatDetailBloc- Repository layer for data persistence
- Error handling for state transitions
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify BLoC pattern integration.
Let's verify the complete BLoC implementation and its integration with the UI.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify BLoC pattern implementation and integration # Test 1: Check for corresponding event file echo "Checking for chat_detail_event.dart..." rg -l "ChatDetailEvent" --type dart # Test 2: Check for BLoC file echo "Checking for chat_detail_bloc.dart..." rg -l "ChatDetailBloc" --type dart # Test 3: Check for proper BLoC usage in widgets echo "Checking for BlocBuilder/BlocConsumer usage..." rg -A 5 "BlocBuilder<ChatDetailBloc" --type dart rg -A 5 "BlocConsumer<ChatDetailBloc" --type dartLength of output: 1340
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the event handling and state transitions in more detail # Check the event file content echo "=== ChatDetailEvent Implementation ===" cat lib/presentation/chat_detail/bloc/chat_detail_event.dart # Check the bloc implementation echo -e "\n=== ChatDetailBloc Implementation ===" cat lib/presentation/chat_detail/bloc/chat_detail_bloc.dart # Check for any repository/data layer integration echo -e "\n=== Checking Repository Integration ===" rg -l "ChatRepository" --type dart # Check the screen implementation for proper event dispatching echo -e "\n=== Chat Detail Screen Event Dispatching ===" rg "context.read<ChatDetailBloc>" -A 3 lib/presentation/chat_detail/screens/chat_detail_screen.dartLength of output: 1883
lib/presentation/auth/bloc/auth_state.dart (1)
47-47: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance AuthRegistrationSuccess state.
- Add documentation to describe when this state is emitted.
- Consider adding relevant registration details (e.g., timestamp) for tracking or analytics purposes.
+/// Indicates that user registration was completed successfully. +/// Emitted when all registration steps are completed. -class AuthRegistrationSuccess extends AuthState {} +class AuthRegistrationSuccess extends AuthState { + final DateTime registeredAt; + + const AuthRegistrationSuccess({DateTime? registeredAt}) + : registeredAt = registeredAt ?? DateTime.now(); + + @override + List<Object> get props => [registeredAt]; +}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// Indicates that user registration was completed successfully. /// Emitted when all registration steps are completed. class AuthRegistrationSuccess extends AuthState { final DateTime registeredAt; const AuthRegistrationSuccess({DateTime? registeredAt}) : registeredAt = registeredAt ?? DateTime.now(); @override List<Object> get props => [registeredAt]; }lib/presentation/order/bloc/order_details_bloc.dart (3)
1-28: 💡 Codebase verification
Missing required states in OrderDetailsStatus enum
The OrderDetailsStatus enum currently only includes
initial,loading,loaded, anderrorstates, but the bloc implementation suggests handling order cancellation and continuation. The enum should be extended to include:
cancelledstate for tracking cancelled ordersprocessingstate for when continuing with an order🔗 Analysis chain
Verify state definitions in OrderDetailsState.
Let's ensure that all required states (
cancelled,processing,error) referenced in the suggested implementations are properly defined in the state file.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for state definitions in the corresponding state file rg -A 10 "OrderDetailsStatus" "lib/presentation/order/bloc/order_details_state.dart"Length of output: 687
19-27:
⚠️ Potential issueImplement proper state management for order actions.
The current implementation uses print statements and lacks proper state management. Both handlers should:
- Emit appropriate states (loading, success, error)
- Implement actual business logic
- Handle potential errors
- Remove debug print statements
Here's a suggested implementation pattern:
void _onCancelOrder(CancelOrder event, Emitter<OrderDetailsState> emit) { - // Implementar lógica para cancelar la orden - print('Cancelling order'); + try { + emit(state.copyWith(status: OrderDetailsStatus.loading)); + // TODO: Implement order cancellation logic + // Example: await orderRepository.cancelOrder(event.orderId); + emit(state.copyWith(status: OrderDetailsStatus.cancelled)); + } catch (e) { + emit(state.copyWith( + status: OrderDetailsStatus.error, + errorMessage: e.toString(), + )); + } } void _onContinueOrder(ContinueOrder event, Emitter<OrderDetailsState> emit) { - // Implementar lógica para continuar con la orden - print('Continuing with order'); + try { + emit(state.copyWith(status: OrderDetailsStatus.loading)); + // TODO: Implement order continuation logic + // Example: await orderRepository.processOrder(event.orderId); + emit(state.copyWith(status: OrderDetailsStatus.processing)); + } catch (e) { + emit(state.copyWith( + status: OrderDetailsStatus.error, + errorMessage: e.toString(), + )); + } }Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of these handlers?
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
12-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and data validation.
Consider these improvements:
- Implement try-catch block for error handling
- Validate order data before emitting loaded state
- Translate the Spanish comment to English for consistency
Here's a suggested implementation:
void _onLoadOrderDetails( LoadOrderDetails event, Emitter<OrderDetailsState> emit) { - emit(state.copyWith(status: OrderDetailsStatus.loading)); - // Aquí podrías cargar información adicional si fuera necesario - emit(state.copyWith(status: OrderDetailsStatus.loaded, order: event.order)); + try { + emit(state.copyWith(status: OrderDetailsStatus.loading)); + + if (event.order == null) { + throw Exception('Order data is required'); + } + + // Additional information can be loaded here if needed + emit(state.copyWith(status: OrderDetailsStatus.loaded, order: event.order)); + } catch (e) { + emit(state.copyWith( + status: OrderDetailsStatus.error, + errorMessage: e.toString(), + )); + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.void _onLoadOrderDetails( LoadOrderDetails event, Emitter<OrderDetailsState> emit) { try { emit(state.copyWith(status: OrderDetailsStatus.loading)); if (event.order == null) { throw Exception('Order data is required'); } // Additional information can be loaded here if needed emit(state.copyWith(status: OrderDetailsStatus.loaded, order: event.order)); } catch (e) { emit(state.copyWith( status: OrderDetailsStatus.error, errorMessage: e.toString(), )); } }lib/presentation/profile/bloc/profile_state.dart (1)
5-11: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response:
Add validation for pubkey and rating fields
The codebase shows that:
pubkeyis used in Nostr events (lib/core/utils/nostr_utils.dart) but lacks format validation in the ProfileStateratingis displayed as "X/5" in the UI (lib/presentation/profile/screens/profile_screen.dart) but has no range constraints- The default values (pubkey = '', rating = 0.0) could allow invalid states
Add these validations in the ProfileState constructor:
- Ensure pubkey is a valid 32-byte hex string (64 characters)
- Constrain rating between 0.0 and 5.0
Example locations needing validation:
- lib/presentation/profile/bloc/profile_state.dart:6-11 (constructor)
- lib/presentation/profile/bloc/profile_state.dart:13-18 (copyWith method)
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify pubkey format and rating range constraints.
Consider adding validation for:
- The
pubkeyproperty to ensure it follows the Nostr hex format (32 bytes, hex-encoded)- The
ratingproperty to ensure it stays within a valid range (typically 0.0 to 5.0)Let's check if there's any validation logic elsewhere in the codebase:
Let's search more broadly to understand how these fields are handled in the codebase. I'm looking for:
- Any usage or manipulation of pubkey and rating fields
- General validation patterns in the codebase
- Any assertions or checks on these fields
This will help us determine if there's existing validation or if we need to recommend adding it.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for pubkey validation patterns echo "Searching for pubkey validation patterns..." rg -l "pubkey.*valid|valid.*pubkey" # Search for rating validation or constraints echo "Searching for rating validation patterns..." rg -l "rating.*range|rating.*valid|valid.*rating"Length of output: 283
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search for pubkey and rating related code echo "Searching for pubkey handling..." rg -A 5 "pubkey" --type dart echo -e "\nSearching for rating handling..." rg -A 5 "rating" --type dart echo -e "\nSearching for validation related code..." ast-grep --pattern 'if ($_ is String) { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'if ($_.length $$$) { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'assert($$$)'Length of output: 16518
lib/presentation/chat_list/bloc/chat_list_bloc.dart (3)
15-35: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Move mock data to a separate file.
Mock data should be moved to a dedicated test fixtures file. This would improve maintainability and make it easier to replace with real implementation later.
Create a new file
test/fixtures/chat_fixtures.dart:class ChatFixtures { static final List<ChatModel> mockChats = [ ChatModel( id: '1', username: 'Alice', lastMessage: 'Hey, are you still interested in the trade?', timeAgo: '5m ago', isUnread: true, ), // ... rest of mock data ]; }Then update this file to use the fixtures in debug/test mode only:
- final chats = [ - ChatModel(...), - ChatModel(...), - ChatModel(...), - ]; + final chats = kDebugMode + ? ChatFixtures.mockChats + : await chatRepository.getChats();
6-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for robustness.
The BLoC should handle potential errors that might occur during chat list loading. Consider adding error handling to prevent app crashes and provide better user feedback.
class ChatListBloc extends Bloc<ChatListEvent, ChatListState> { ChatListBloc() : super(const ChatListState()) { on<LoadChatList>(_onLoadChatList); + on<ChatListError>(_onError); } + + void _onError(ChatListError event, Emitter<ChatListState> emit) { + emit(state.copyWith( + status: ChatListStatus.error, + error: event.error, + )); + }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
11-41: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add documentation and improve error handling.
The public method lacks documentation and proper error handling. Consider adding documentation and try-catch block for potential errors.
+ /// Handles the LoadChatList event by fetching the list of chats + /// and updating the state accordingly. + /// + /// Emits [ChatListStatus.loading] while fetching the data and + /// [ChatListStatus.loaded] when successful. If an error occurs, + /// emits [ChatListStatus.error] with the error details. void _onLoadChatList(LoadChatList event, Emitter<ChatListState> emit) async { emit(state.copyWith(status: ChatListStatus.loading)); + try { // Simulating chat loading (replace this with actual repository or API call) final chats = // ... chat loading logic emit(state.copyWith( status: ChatListStatus.loaded, chats: chats, )); + } catch (e) { + emit(state.copyWith( + status: ChatListStatus.error, + error: e.toString(), + )); + } }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
.gitignore (4)
36-36: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueRemove the comment from .gitignore to track proguard-rules.pro
The file contains important ProGuard rules specifically for handling warnings related to Flutter Secure Storage annotations. These rules should be version controlled to ensure consistent release builds across the team.
- Remove the
#comment from line 36 in.gitignoreto trackandroid/app/proguard-rules.pro🔗 Analysis chain
Verify if proguard-rules.pro should be tracked.
The commented out
#android/app/proguard-rules.prosuggests uncertainty about whether this file should be tracked. ProGuard rules are typically important for Android release builds and should be version controlled.Consider tracking this file by removing the comment if it contains important ProGuard rules for your release builds.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if proguard-rules.pro exists and contains important rules fd proguard-rules.pro | xargs catLength of output: 418
70-73: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider environment-specific ignores.
The Misc section could benefit from including environment-specific files that shouldn't be tracked.
Add these patterns to handle environment files:
# Misc *.log *.lock .pdm +.env +.env.local +*.env* +!.env.exampleThis ensures:
- No sensitive environment variables are committed
- Example environment files can still be tracked
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.# Misc *.log *.lock .pdm .env .env.local *.env* !.env.example
34-45: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance Android build artifacts exclusions.
The Android section could be more comprehensive to prevent accidental commits of build artifacts.
Add these patterns to better handle Android-specific files:
# Android android/.gradle/ #android/app/proguard-rules.pro android/local.properties android/*.keystore # Android Studio *.jks *.gradle *.apk .cxx/ +android/app/debug/ +android/app/profile/ +android/app/release/ +*.aab +*.aarThis will additionally ignore:
- Build variant outputs
- Android App Bundles (*.aab)
- Android Archive files (*.aar)
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.# Android android/.gradle/ #android/app/proguard-rules.pro android/local.properties android/*.keystore # Android Studio *.jks *.gradle *.apk .cxx/ android/app/debug/ android/app/profile/ android/app/release/ *.aab *.aar
1-73: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider additional patterns for repository cleanup.
Given the PR's mention of 400MB+ of build files and planned repository cleanup:
Add these patterns to catch more build artifacts:
# Flutter & Dart **/build/ **/.dart_tool/ **/.packages **/pubspec.lock **/.flutter-plugins **/.flutter-plugins-dependencies **/.flutter-versions +**/generated_* +**/*.g.dart +**/*.freezed.dart +**/*.mocks.dart # Misc *.log *.lock .pdm +**/*.symbols +coverage/ +.coverage/These additions will help:
- Ignore generated files (models, JSON serialization, etc.)
- Exclude test coverage reports
- Prevent accidental commits of debug symbols
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.# Flutter & Dart **/build/ **/.dart_tool/ **/.packages **/pubspec.lock **/.flutter-plugins **/.flutter-plugins-dependencies **/.flutter-versions **/generated_* **/*.g.dart **/*.freezed.dart **/*.mocks.dart # IntelliJ related .idea/ *.iml *.ipr *.iws # Visual Studio Code related .vscode/ *.code-workspace # macOS .DS_Store # iOS ios/Flutter/.last_build_id ios/Pods/ ios/.symlinks/ ios/Flutter/Flutter.framework ios/Flutter/App.framework ios/Flutter/engine/Flutter.framework ios/Flutter/engine/Flutter.podspec ios/.generated/ ios/.dart_tool/ # Android android/.gradle/ #android/app/proguard-rules.pro android/local.properties android/*.keystore # Android Studio *.jks *.gradle *.apk .cxx/ # Firebase and Google Services android/app/google-services.json ios/Runner/GoogleService-Info.plist # Web web/.dart_tool/ web/.packages web/build/ # Windows windows/flutter/generated_plugin_registrant.cc windows/.flutter-plugins windows/.flutter-plugins-dependencies # Linux linux/flutter/generated_plugin_registrant.cc linux/.flutter-plugins linux/.flutter-plugins-dependencies # Chrome OS chrome/.cxx chrome/.dart_tool chrome/.packages # Misc *.log *.lock .pdm **/*.symbols coverage/ .coverage/lib/data/repositories/mostro_order_repository.dart (2)
31-33: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace string literal with enum or constant.
Using string literals for status comparison is error-prone and makes refactoring difficult.
Consider defining an enum or constants:
enum OrderStatus { pending, completed, cancelled // add other statuses } // Then use it as: return _mostroService.subscribeToOrders() .where((order) => order.status == OrderStatus.pending.toString());
16-18:
⚠️ Potential issueValidate orderId parameter.
Methods accepting orderId should validate the parameter before making service calls.
Add parameter validation:
@override Future<void> cancelOrder(String orderId) async { + if (orderId.isEmpty) { + throw OrderRepositoryException('Order ID cannot be empty'); + } await _mostroService.cancelOrder(orderId); }Also applies to: 36-38, 41-43
lib/core/routes/app_routes.dart (1)
23-46: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving route generation implementation.
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- Duplicates route definitions from the
routesgetter- Lacks support for route arguments
- Missing route transition customization
- Could benefit from error logging
Consider this improved implementation:
- static Route<dynamic> onGenerateRoute(RouteSettings settings) { + static Route<dynamic> onGenerateRoute(RouteSettings settings) { + // Check if the route is registered in the routes map + final routeBuilder = routes[settings.name]; + if (routeBuilder != null) { + return MaterialPageRoute( + builder: routeBuilder, + settings: settings, + ); + } + + // Handle unknown routes + debugPrint('No route defined for ${settings.name}'); return MaterialPageRoute( builder: (context) { - switch (settings.name) { - case welcome: - return const WelcomeScreen(); - case home: - return const HomeScreen(); - case chatList: - return const ChatListScreen(); - case profile: - return const ProfileScreen(); - case register: - return const RegisterScreen(); - default: - return const Scaffold( - body: Center( - child: Text('No route defined'), - ), - ); - } + return const Scaffold( + body: Center( + child: Text('Route not found'), + ), + ); }, + settings: settings, ); }This implementation:
- Reuses the routes from the getter to avoid duplication
- Preserves route settings for proper navigation
- Adds error logging for undefined routes
- Provides a foundation for adding route transition animations and argument passing
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
.idx/dev.nix (4)
24-24:
⚠️ Potential issueReplace hardcoded paths with environment variables.
The hardcoded path
/home/user/myappwill break in different environments.-cd /home/user/myapp/android +cd $WORKSPACE_ROOT/android📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.cd $WORKSPACE_ROOT/android
7-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding more essential development tools.
While the current package list covers basic needs, consider adding these commonly needed tools:
android-tools- for better ADB supportgradle- for standalone Gradle operationsflutter- to ensure consistent Flutter versionpackages = [ pkgs.nodePackages.firebase-tools pkgs.jdk17 pkgs.unzip + pkgs.android-tools + pkgs.gradle + pkgs.flutter ];📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.packages = [ pkgs.nodePackages.firebase-tools pkgs.jdk17 pkgs.unzip pkgs.android-tools pkgs.gradle pkgs.flutter ];
44-44:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove ADB device detection reliability.
The current implementation has potential reliability issues:
- Hardcoded emulator port might fail if the port is different
- No timeout for device detection could cause indefinite waiting
-adb -s localhost:5555 wait-for-device +# Add timeout and device detection +timeout 60 sh -c 'until adb devices | grep -q "device$"; do sleep 1; done'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.timeout 60 sh -c 'until adb devices | grep -q "device$"; do sleep 1; done'
54-61: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance preview configuration robustness.
The preview configuration could be more robust:
- Web preview should handle port conflicts
- Android preview has hardcoded device port
web = { - command = ["flutter" "run" "--machine" "-d" "web-server" "--web-hostname" "0.0.0.0" "--web-port" "$PORT"]; + command = ["sh" "-c" "while ! nc -z localhost $PORT; do PORT=$((PORT+1)); done && flutter run --machine -d web-server --web-hostname 0.0.0.0 --web-port $PORT"]; manager = "flutter"; }; android = { - command = ["flutter" "run" "--machine" "-d" "android" "-d" "localhost:5555"]; + command = ["sh" "-c" "DEVICE=$(adb devices | grep -v List | head -n1 | cut -f1) && flutter run --machine -d android -d $DEVICE"]; manager = "flutter"; };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.web = { command = ["sh" "-c" "while ! nc -z localhost $PORT; do PORT=$((PORT+1)); done && flutter run --machine -d web-server --web-hostname 0.0.0.0 --web-port $PORT"]; manager = "flutter"; }; android = { command = ["sh" "-c" "DEVICE=$(adb devices | grep -v List | head -n1 | cut -f1) && flutter run --machine -d android -d $DEVICE"]; manager = "flutter"; };lib/presentation/widgets/bottom_nav_bar.dart (3)
53-65: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance null safety in route checking.
The current implementation could be more robust with proper null handling.
bool _isActive(BuildContext context, int index) { - final currentRoute = ModalRoute.of(context)?.settings.name; + final currentRoute = ModalRoute.of(context)?.settings.name ?? ''; switch (index) { case 0: return currentRoute == AppRoutes.home; case 1: return currentRoute == AppRoutes.chatList; case 2: return currentRoute == AppRoutes.profile; default: return false; } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.bool _isActive(BuildContext context, int index) { final currentRoute = ModalRoute.of(context)?.settings.name ?? ''; switch (index) { case 0: return currentRoute == AppRoutes.home; case 1: return currentRoute == AppRoutes.chatList; case 2: return currentRoute == AppRoutes.profile; default: return false; } }
8-31: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving widget flexibility and maintainability.
The widget could benefit from the following improvements:
- Use theme colors instead of hardcoded values
- Consider making dimensions responsive or configurable
- Extract constants to a separate file
Here's a suggested improvement:
+ // Consider creating a constants file + class BottomNavBarConstants { + static const double height = 56.0; + static const double width = 240.0; + static const double verticalPadding = 16.0; + static const double borderRadius = 28.0; + } @override Widget build(BuildContext context) { + final theme = Theme.of(context); return Container( - padding: const EdgeInsets.symmetric(vertical: 16), + padding: const EdgeInsets.symmetric( + vertical: BottomNavBarConstants.verticalPadding + ), child: Center( child: Container( - height: 56, - width: 240, + height: BottomNavBarConstants.height, + width: BottomNavBarConstants.width, decoration: BoxDecoration( - color: Colors.white, + color: theme.colorScheme.surface, - borderRadius: BorderRadius.circular(28), + borderRadius: BorderRadius.circular( + BottomNavBarConstants.borderRadius + ), ),Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
33-51: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve theme consistency in navigation items.
The navigation items should respect the app's theme settings for better dark mode support and visual consistency.
Widget _buildNavItem(BuildContext context, HeroIcons icon, int index) { bool isActive = _isActive(context, index); + final theme = Theme.of(context); return GestureDetector( onTap: () => _onItemTapped(context, index), child: Container( padding: const EdgeInsets.all(8), decoration: BoxDecoration( - color: isActive ? const Color(0xFF8CC541) : Colors.transparent, + color: isActive ? theme.colorScheme.primary : Colors.transparent, borderRadius: BorderRadius.circular(28), ), child: HeroIcon( icon, style: HeroIconStyle.outline, - color: Colors.black, + color: isActive + ? theme.colorScheme.onPrimary + : theme.colorScheme.onSurface, size: 24, ), ), ); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.Widget _buildNavItem(BuildContext context, HeroIcons icon, int index) { bool isActive = _isActive(context, index); final theme = Theme.of(context); return GestureDetector( onTap: () => _onItemTapped(context, index), child: Container( padding: const EdgeInsets.all(8), decoration: BoxDecoration( color: isActive ? theme.colorScheme.primary : Colors.transparent, borderRadius: BorderRadius.circular(28), ), child: HeroIcon( icon, style: HeroIconStyle.outline, color: isActive ? theme.colorScheme.onPrimary : theme.colorScheme.onSurface, size: 24, ), ), ); }lib/presentation/auth/screens/login_screen.dart (4)
15-18:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd dispose method to prevent memory leaks.
The
_pinControllerneeds to be disposed when the widget is destroyed.Add the following method:
+ @override + void dispose() { + _pinController.dispose(); + super.dispose(); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.class _LoginScreenState extends State<LoginScreen> { final _formKey = GlobalKey<FormState>(); final _pinController = TextEditingController(); @override void dispose() { _pinController.dispose(); super.dispose(); }
45-63:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance PIN input security and validation.
The PIN input field needs additional security measures and validation:
- Add maximum length validation
- Restrict input to numeric only
- Consider adding rate limiting for failed attempts
Enhance the TextFormField with these improvements:
TextFormField( controller: _pinController, + maxLength: 6, // Or your desired PIN length + inputFormatters: [FilteringTextInputFormatter.digitsOnly], decoration: const InputDecoration( labelText: 'PIN', labelStyle: TextStyle(color: Colors.white70), enabledBorder: UnderlineInputBorder( borderSide: BorderSide(color: Colors.white70), ), + counterText: '', // Hide character counter ), style: const TextStyle(color: Colors.white), keyboardType: TextInputType.number, obscureText: true, validator: (value) { if (value == null || value.isEmpty) { return 'Please enter your PIN'; } + if (value.length != 6) { // Or your desired PIN length + return 'PIN must be 6 digits'; + } return null; }, ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.TextFormField( controller: _pinController, maxLength: 6, // Or your desired PIN length inputFormatters: [FilteringTextInputFormatter.digitsOnly], decoration: const InputDecoration( labelText: 'PIN', labelStyle: TextStyle(color: Colors.white70), enabledBorder: UnderlineInputBorder( borderSide: BorderSide(color: Colors.white70), ), counterText: '', // Hide character counter ), style: const TextStyle(color: Colors.white), keyboardType: TextInputType.number, obscureText: true, validator: (value) { if (value == null || value.isEmpty) { return 'Please enter your PIN'; } if (value.length != 6) { // Or your desired PIN length return 'PIN must be 6 digits'; } return null; }, ),
77-81:
⚠️ Potential issueEnhance login handler security.
The login handler should clear the PIN after submission and implement rate limiting.
Improve the handler with these security measures:
+ DateTime? _lastLoginAttempt; + void _onLogin() { + // Prevent rapid login attempts + final now = DateTime.now(); + if (_lastLoginAttempt != null && + now.difference(_lastLoginAttempt!) < const Duration(seconds: 2)) { + ScaffoldMessenger.of(context).showSnackBar( + const SnackBar(content: Text('Please wait before trying again')), + ); + return; + } + _lastLoginAttempt = now; + if (_formKey.currentState!.validate()) { context.read<AuthBloc>().add(AuthLoginRequested(_pinController.text)); + // Clear PIN after submission + _pinController.clear(); } }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
28-37: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and loading state.
The BlocListener should handle loading states and provide better error feedback.
Consider this enhancement:
BlocListener<AuthBloc, AuthState>( listener: (context, state) { if (state is AuthAuthenticated) { Navigator.of(context).pushReplacementNamed('/home'); + } else if (state is AuthLoading) { + // Show loading indicator + showDialog( + context: context, + barrierDismissible: false, + builder: (context) => const Center( + child: CircularProgressIndicator(), + ), + ); } else if (state is AuthFailure) { + // Dismiss loading indicator if shown + Navigator.of(context).pop(); ScaffoldMessenger.of(context).showSnackBar( SnackBar(content: Text(state.error)), ); } },Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
lib/presentation/payment_qr/screens/payment_qr_screen.dart (5)
27-78: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance state handling and user experience.
Several improvements could be made to the state handling:
- Add handling for initial state
- Implement auto-refresh mechanism for QR code expiration
- Add copy/share functionality for QR code data
- Improve error state with retry mechanism
Here's a suggested implementation for the QR code auto-refresh:
class PaymentQrScreen extends StatefulWidget { const PaymentQrScreen({super.key}); @override State<PaymentQrScreen> createState() => _PaymentQrScreenState(); } class _PaymentQrScreenState extends State<PaymentQrScreen> { Timer? _expirationTimer; @override void dispose() { _expirationTimer?.cancel(); super.dispose(); } void _startExpirationTimer(BuildContext context) { _expirationTimer?.cancel(); _expirationTimer = Timer.periodic( const Duration(seconds: 1), (_) => context.read<PaymentQrBloc>().add(CheckExpiration()), ); }
40-45: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve QR code implementation for better reliability.
The QR code implementation could be enhanced:
- Add error correction level for better readability
- Adapt size to screen dimensions
- Add validation for QR data
QrImage( data: state.qrData, version: QrVersions.auto, - size: 200.0, + size: MediaQuery.of(context).size.width * 0.8, + errorCorrectionLevel: QrErrorCorrectLevel.H, foregroundColor: Colors.white, + backgroundColor: Colors.transparent, ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.QrImage( data: state.qrData, version: QrVersions.auto, size: MediaQuery.of(context).size.width * 0.8, errorCorrectionLevel: QrErrorCorrectLevel.H, foregroundColor: Colors.white, backgroundColor: Colors.transparent, ),
16-81: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve accessibility and theme consistency.
The UI needs accessibility improvements and better theme integration:
- Add semantic labels for screen readers
- Use theme colors instead of hard-coded values
- Use flexible spacing based on screen size
-backgroundColor: const Color(0xFF1D212C), +backgroundColor: Theme.of(context).scaffoldBackgroundColor, -const Text( - 'Pay this invoice to continue the exchange', - style: TextStyle(color: Colors.white), -), +Semantics( + label: 'Payment invoice instructions', + child: Text( + 'Pay this invoice to continue the exchange', + style: Theme.of(context).textTheme.bodyLarge?.copyWith( + color: Theme.of(context).colorScheme.onBackground, + ), + ), +),Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
14-15: 💡 Codebase verification
Bloc implementation needs error handling for LoadPaymentQr event
The verification reveals:
- The
_onLoadPaymentQrhandler is empty with just a TODO comment- No explicit error handling is implemented for the LoadPaymentQr event
- Regarding disposal: BlocProvider in Flutter automatically handles bloc disposal, so no explicit close override is required
Recommendations:
- Implement the TODO logic in
_onLoadPaymentQrwith proper try-catch error handling- Emit appropriate error states when the QR loading fails
🔗 Analysis chain
Add error handling for initial LoadPaymentQr event and ensure proper bloc disposal.
The bloc is created and immediately triggered with an event, but there's no error handling for the initial load. Consider wrapping the bloc creation in a try-catch block and implementing proper disposal.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if PaymentQrBloc implements proper disposal ast-grep --pattern 'class PaymentQrBloc extends Bloc { $$$ @override Future<void> close() { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first check the PaymentQrBloc implementation rg "class PaymentQrBloc" -A 10 # Also check for any dispose/close pattern in the file rg "dispose|close" lib/presentation/payment_qr/ # Check bloc event handling pattern rg "on<LoadPaymentQr>" -A 5Length of output: 1653
52-63: 💡 Codebase verification
Wallet integration needs implementation and error handling
Based on the code analysis:
- The
_onOpenWalletmethod is empty with only a TODO comment- No wallet availability check is implemented
- No wallet-specific error states exist in
PaymentQrState- No URL launcher or wallet opening implementation found
Required improvements:
- Implement the
_onOpenWalletmethod with proper error handling- Add wallet-specific states (e.g.,
WalletUnavailable,WalletOpenFailure)- Add wallet availability check before showing the button
- Implement feedback mechanism using the bloc pattern
🔗 Analysis chain
Enhance wallet integration with proper error handling.
The wallet integration needs improvement:
- Add error handling for wallet opening
- Check wallet availability before showing the button
- Provide feedback when wallet operation is triggered
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if wallet availability check is implemented ast-grep --pattern 'class PaymentQrBloc { $$$ Future<bool> _checkWalletAvailability() { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the PaymentQrBloc implementation and error handling rg -A 10 "class PaymentQrBloc" # Check for wallet-related error handling rg -A 5 "OpenWallet|WalletError|WalletFailure" # Check if there's any wallet availability check in the codebase rg -A 5 "checkWallet|isWalletAvailable|canOpenWallet" # Look for any wallet-related state handling ast-grep --pattern 'class PaymentQrState { $$$ }'Length of output: 2747
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the PaymentQrState implementation rg -A 10 "class PaymentQrState" # Check for any wallet-related states or error states rg -A 5 "extends PaymentQrState" # Look for any URL launcher or wallet opening implementation rg -A 5 "launchUrl|openWallet|url_launcher"Length of output: 2198
lib/presentation/chat_detail/screens/chat_detail_screen.dart (5)
18-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Move color values to theme configuration.
Color values are hardcoded throughout the file. These should be moved to a theme configuration for better maintainability and consistency.
Create a theme configuration file and reference colors from there:
// lib/core/theme/colors.dart class AppColors { static const backgroundColor = Color(0xFF1D212C); static const surfaceColor = Color(0xFF303544); static const primaryColor = Color(0xFF8CC541); }Also applies to: 66-66, 81-81, 96-96
77-112:
⚠️ Potential issueRefactor message input implementation for better state management.
Current implementation has several issues:
- TextEditingController is recreated on every build
- Missing input validation and sanitization
- No keyboard submit action handling
- Potential memory leak with controller
Convert to StatefulWidget or move the input to a separate StatefulWidget component:
class MessageInput extends StatefulWidget { final Function(String) onSend; const MessageInput({Key? key, required this.onSend}) : super(key: key); @override _MessageInputState createState() => _MessageInputState(); } class _MessageInputState extends State<MessageInput> { late final TextEditingController _controller; @override void initState() { super.initState(); _controller = TextEditingController(); } @override void dispose() { _controller.dispose(); super.dispose(); } void _handleSubmit() { final text = _controller.text.trim(); if (text.isNotEmpty) { widget.onSend(text); _controller.clear(); } } @override Widget build(BuildContext context) { return Container( padding: const EdgeInsets.all(8), color: AppColors.surfaceColor, child: Row( children: [ Expanded( child: TextField( controller: _controller, style: const TextStyle(color: Colors.white), textInputAction: TextInputAction.send, onSubmitted: (_) => _handleSubmit(), decoration: InputDecoration( hintText: 'Type a message...', hintStyle: const TextStyle(color: Colors.grey), border: OutlineInputBorder( borderRadius: BorderRadius.circular(20), borderSide: BorderSide.none, ), filled: true, fillColor: AppColors.backgroundColor, ), ), ), IconButton( icon: const Icon(Icons.send, color: AppColors.primaryColor), onPressed: _handleSubmit, ), ], ), ); } }
22-22:
⚠️ Potential issueReplace hardcoded chat title with dynamic user name.
The title "JACK FOOTSEY" is hardcoded. This should be dynamic based on the chat participant's name.
- title: const Text('JACK FOOTSEY'), + title: Text(state.chatPartner?.name ?? 'Chat'),Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
59-75: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance message bubble implementation.
Several improvements can be made to the message bubble:
- The sender identifier 'Mostro' is hardcoded
- Message timestamps are not displayed
- Missing accessibility labels for screen readers
Widget _buildMessageBubble(ChatMessage message) { + final bool isCurrentUser = message.sender == currentUserId; return Container( padding: const EdgeInsets.symmetric(vertical: 8, horizontal: 16), - alignment: message.sender == 'Mostro' ? Alignment.centerLeft : Alignment.centerRight, + alignment: isCurrentUser ? Alignment.centerRight : Alignment.centerLeft, child: Container( padding: const EdgeInsets.all(12), decoration: BoxDecoration( - color: message.sender == 'Mostro' ? const Color(0xFF303544) : const Color(0xFF8CC541), + color: isCurrentUser ? AppColors.primaryColor : AppColors.surfaceColor, borderRadius: BorderRadius.circular(12), ), - child: Text( - message.content, - style: const TextStyle(color: Colors.white), + child: Column( + crossAxisAlignment: CrossAxisAlignment.start, + children: [ + Text( + message.content, + style: const TextStyle(color: Colors.white), + semanticsLabel: '${isCurrentUser ? 'You' : message.senderName}: ${message.content}', + ), + const SizedBox(height: 4), + Text( + _formatTimestamp(message.timestamp), + style: TextStyle( + color: Colors.white.withOpacity(0.6), + fontSize: 12, + ), + ), + ], ), ), ); }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
47-49: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add retry mechanism for error state.
The error state simply displays the error message without providing a way to retry the operation.
} else if (state is ChatDetailError) { - return Center(child: Text(state.error)); + return Center( + child: Column( + mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.center, + children: [ + Text(state.error), + ElevatedButton( + onPressed: () => context + .read<ChatDetailBloc>() + .add(LoadChatDetail(chatId)), + child: const Text('Retry'), + ), + ], + ), + );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.} else if (state is ChatDetailError) { return Center( child: Column( mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.center, children: [ Text(state.error), ElevatedButton( onPressed: () => context .read<ChatDetailBloc>() .add(LoadChatDetail(chatId)), child: const Text('Retry'), ), ], ), ); } else {lib/presentation/profile/screens/profile_screen.dart (4)
18-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve theme consistency and maintainability.
Hard-coded colors and styles are scattered throughout the code. Consider:
- Moving colors to a theme file
- Using theme-based text styles
- Making dimensions responsive
Create a theme file and update the code to use it:
// lib/theme/colors.dart class AppColors { static const backgroundColor = Color(0xFF1D212C); static const surfaceColor = Color(0xFF303544); static const accentColor = Color(0xFF8CC541); } // lib/theme/text_styles.dart class AppTextStyles { static const profileUsername = TextStyle( fontSize: 24, fontWeight: FontWeight.bold, ); }Then update the usage:
- backgroundColor: const Color(0xFF1D212C), + backgroundColor: AppColors.backgroundColor,Also applies to: 75-78, 85-85, 97-98
31-31:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove debug print statement.
Debug print statements should not be included in production code. Consider using proper logging mechanisms if debugging information is needed.
- print('Current profile state: ${state.status}');📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
65-65:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd null safety check for username access.
Accessing the first character of username without checking for empty string could cause runtime errors.
- state.username[0].toUpperCase(), + state.username.isNotEmpty ? state.username[0].toUpperCase() : '?',📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.state.username.isNotEmpty ? state.username[0].toUpperCase() : '?',
40-41: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error message presentation.
The current error message might expose technical details to users. Consider implementing a more user-friendly error message display.
- return Center( - child: Text('Error: ${state.errorMessage}')); + return Center( + child: Column( + mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.center, + children: [ + const Icon(Icons.error_outline, color: Colors.red, size: 48), + const SizedBox(height: 16), + const Text( + 'Unable to load profile', + style: TextStyle(color: Colors.white, fontSize: 16), + ), + if (state.errorMessage.isNotEmpty) ...[ + const SizedBox(height: 8), + Text( + 'Please try again later', + style: TextStyle(color: Colors.white.withOpacity(0.7)), + ), + ], + ], + ), + );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.return Center( child: Column( mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.center, children: [ const Icon(Icons.error_outline, color: Colors.red, size: 48), const SizedBox(height: 16), const Text( 'Unable to load profile', style: TextStyle(color: Colors.white, fontSize: 16), ), if (state.errorMessage.isNotEmpty) ...[ const SizedBox(height: 8), Text( 'Please try again later', style: TextStyle(color: Colors.white.withOpacity(0.7)), ), ], ], ), );lib/presentation/payment_confirmation/screens/payment_confirmation_screen.dart (3)
13-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling for initial load failure.
While the BlocProvider setup is correct, consider wrapping the initial LoadPaymentConfirmation event with try-catch to handle potential initialization errors gracefully.
create: (context) => PaymentConfirmationBloc()..add(LoadPaymentConfirmation()), +create: (context) { + final bloc = PaymentConfirmationBloc(); + try { + bloc.add(LoadPaymentConfirmation()); + } catch (e) { + bloc.add(PaymentConfirmationError(e.toString())); + } + return bloc; +},Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
31-89: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance accessibility and maintainability of the confirmation UI.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add semantic labels for accessibility
- Move text strings to localization files
- Extract color constants to a theme file
Example improvements:
Container( child: Icon( Icons.check, size: 50, color: Colors.white, + semanticsLabel: 'Payment confirmed', ), ), Text( - '${state.satoshisReceived} satoshis', + AppLocalizations.of(context).paymentReceivedAmount(state.satoshisReceived), style: Theme.of(context).textTheme.headlineMedium?.copyWith( - color: Colors.white, + color: Theme.of(context).colorScheme.onBackground, ), ),Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
90-104: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and user experience.
The current error handling could be enhanced by:
- Adding a retry button for error cases
- Providing more context in the unexpected state case
- Logging errors for debugging
} else if (state is PaymentConfirmationError) { return Center( - child: Text( - 'Error: ${state.error}', - style: const TextStyle(color: Colors.white), + child: Column( + mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.center, + children: [ + Text( + 'Error: ${state.error}', + style: Theme.of(context).textTheme.bodyLarge?.copyWith( + color: Theme.of(context).colorScheme.error, + ), + ), + ElevatedButton( + onPressed: () => context + .read<PaymentConfirmationBloc>() + .add(LoadPaymentConfirmation()), + child: const Text('Retry'), + ), + ], ), ); } else { + debugPrint('Unexpected state: $state'); return const Center( child: Text( - 'Unexpected state', + 'Something went wrong. Please try again.', style: TextStyle(color: Colors.white), ), ); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.} else if (state is PaymentConfirmationError) { return Center( child: Column( mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.center, children: [ Text( 'Error: ${state.error}', style: Theme.of(context).textTheme.bodyLarge?.copyWith( color: Theme.of(context).colorScheme.error, ), ), ElevatedButton( onPressed: () => context .read<PaymentConfirmationBloc>() .add(LoadPaymentConfirmation()), child: const Text('Retry'), ), ], ), ); } else { debugPrint('Unexpected state: $state'); return const Center( child: Text( 'Something went wrong. Please try again.', style: TextStyle(color: Colors.white), ), ); }lib/presentation/home/screens/home_screen.dart (1)
22-43: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving the RefreshIndicator implementation.
While the pull-to-refresh functionality is a good addition, there are several areas for improvement:
- The hardcoded 1-second delay might mask actual performance issues or create unnecessary waiting time.
- There's no error handling for the refresh operation.
Consider this implementation:
body: RefreshIndicator( onRefresh: () async { - context.read<HomeBloc>().add(LoadOrders()); - await Future.delayed(const Duration(seconds: 1)); + try { + context.read<HomeBloc>().add(LoadOrders()); + // Wait for the actual operation to complete instead of artificial delay + await context.read<HomeBloc>().stream.firstWhere( + (state) => state.status != HomeStatus.loading + ); + } catch (e) { + // Show error message to user + ScaffoldMessenger.of(context).showSnackBar( + SnackBar(content: Text('Failed to refresh: ${e.toString()}')), + ); + } },Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
lib/presentation/chat_list/screens/chat_list_screen.dart (5)
18-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract color constants to a theme file.
Hardcoded colors should be moved to a theme configuration file for better maintainability and consistency across the app.
- backgroundColor: const Color(0xFF1D212C), + backgroundColor: Theme.of(context).scaffoldBackgroundColor, - color: const Color(0xFF303544), + color: Theme.of(context).cardColor,Also applies to: 23-23
40-60: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding pull-to-refresh functionality.
For better user experience, consider implementing pull-to-refresh to allow users to manually refresh their chat list.
- child: BlocBuilder<ChatListBloc, ChatListState>( + child: RefreshIndicator( + onRefresh: () async { + context.read<ChatListBloc>().add(LoadChatList()); + return Future.delayed(const Duration(seconds: 1)); + }, + child: BlocBuilder<ChatListBloc, ChatListState>(Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
15-17: 💡 Codebase verification
Missing test coverage for ChatListBloc
The verification reveals that ChatListBloc lacks test coverage:
- No test files exist for ChatListBloc in any test directory
- The only test directories present are platform-specific (ios/RunnerTests, macos/RunnerTests)
- ChatListBloc is a critical component used in both chat_list_screen.dart and main.dart
Recommended actions:
- Create a test directory at the project root
- Add unit tests for ChatListBloc covering state transitions and event handling
- Include test cases for LoadChatList event and resulting states
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify test coverage for ChatListBloc.
The ChatListBloc is a crucial component handling the chat list state. Let's verify its test coverage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for ChatListBloc tests echo "Searching for ChatListBloc tests..." fd -e dart "chat_list_bloc_test" test/ # Check if the bloc file itself contains test-related comments or TODOs echo "Checking bloc file for test-related comments..." rg -i "test|todo" lib/presentation/chat_list/bloc/chat_list_bloc.dartLength of output: 389
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, let's check if the test directory exists and its structure fd -t d "test" # Let's find all test files in the project fd -e dart "test" # Let's search for any references to ChatListBloc in dart files rg -t dart "ChatListBloc" --type-add 'dart:*.dart' # Let's also check the actual ChatListBloc implementation fd "chat_list_bloc.dart"Length of output: 768
70-139: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance ChatListItem with interaction and accessibility features.
The chat item implementation could benefit from the following improvements:
- Add tap handling to navigate to chat details
- Implement hero transitions for avatars
- Add accessibility labels for screen readers
- return Container( + return InkWell( + onTap: () => Navigator.pushNamed( + context, + '/chat-detail', + arguments: chat, + ), + child: Semantics( + label: 'Chat with ${chat.username}', + hint: chat.isUnread ? 'Unread messages' : null, + child: Container( margin: const EdgeInsets.symmetric(vertical: 8, horizontal: 16), decoration: BoxDecoration( color: const Color(0xFF1D212C), borderRadius: BorderRadius.circular(12), ), child: Padding( padding: const EdgeInsets.all(16), child: Row( children: [ - CircleAvatar( + Hero( + tag: 'avatar_${chat.username}', + child: CircleAvatar( backgroundColor: Colors.grey, child: Text( chat.username[0], style: const TextStyle(color: Colors.white), ), + ), ),Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
52-54: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error message handling.
The current error display could be more user-friendly and provide better guidance to users.
- return Center( - child: - Text(state.errorMessage ?? 'An error occurred')); + return Center( + child: Column( + mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.center, + children: [ + const Icon(Icons.error_outline, color: Colors.red, size: 48), + const SizedBox(height: 16), + Text( + state.errorMessage ?? 'Unable to load chats. Please try again later.', + textAlign: TextAlign.center, + style: Theme.of(context).textTheme.bodyLarge, + ), + const SizedBox(height: 16), + ElevatedButton( + onPressed: () => context.read<ChatListBloc>().add(LoadChatList()), + child: const Text('Retry'), + ), + ], + ), + );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.return Center( child: Column( mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.center, children: [ const Icon(Icons.error_outline, color: Colors.red, size: 48), const SizedBox(height: 16), Text( state.errorMessage ?? 'Unable to load chats. Please try again later.', textAlign: TextAlign.center, style: Theme.of(context).textTheme.bodyLarge, ), const SizedBox(height: 16), ElevatedButton( onPressed: () => context.read<ChatListBloc>().add(LoadChatList()), child: const Text('Retry'), ), ], ), );lib/presentation/widgets/order_list_item.dart (6)
24-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract theme-related constants.
Hard-coded colors, dimensions, and text styles should be moved to a theme configuration for consistency and maintainability.
+// In your theme file +class AppColors { + static const darkBackground = Color(0xFF1D212C); +} + +class AppTextStyles { + static const orderItemText = TextStyle(color: Colors.white); +} // In the widget -color: const Color(0xFF1D212C), +color: AppColors.darkBackground, -style: const TextStyle(color: Colors.white), +style: AppTextStyles.orderItemText,Also applies to: 37-43
153-175:
⚠️ Potential issueRefactor text styling logic.
The current implementation has counterintuitive font size logic where non-value text is larger than value text. Also, the
isBoldparameter is unused.-fontSize: isValue ? 16.0 : 24.0, +fontSize: isValue ? 24.0 : 16.0, +fontWeight: isBold ? FontWeight.bold : FontWeight.normal,Additionally, consider extracting the text styles to a theme configuration and preparing for internationalization:
// In your theme file class AppTextStyles { static TextStyle orderValueStyle({bool isBold = false}) => TextStyle( fontSize: 24.0, fontWeight: isBold ? FontWeight.bold : FontWeight.normal, fontFamily: GoogleFonts.robotoCondensed().fontFamily, ); static TextStyle orderLabelStyle = TextStyle( fontSize: 16.0, fontWeight: FontWeight.normal, fontFamily: GoogleFonts.robotoCondensed().fontFamily, ); }
15-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using named routes for navigation.
Instead of directly using MaterialPageRoute, consider using named routes for better maintainability and consistent navigation handling across the app.
-Navigator.of(context).push( - MaterialPageRoute( - builder: (context) => OrderDetailsScreen(initialOrder: order), - ), -); +Navigator.of(context).pushNamed( + '/order-details', + arguments: order, +);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
118-125: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve text overflow handling.
The current overflow handling might not provide the best user experience. Consider using ellipsis and showing the full text on tap.
Flexible( child: Text( order.paymentMethod, - style: const TextStyle(color: Colors.grey), - overflow: TextOverflow.visible, - softWrap: true, + style: const TextStyle( + color: Colors.grey, + overflow: TextOverflow.ellipsis, + ), + maxLines: 1, ), ),Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
140-151: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve payment method icon mapping.
The current implementation has several limitations:
- Case-sensitive matching might cause issues
- Limited payment method support
- Duplicate logic for similar payment methods
-HeroIcons _getPaymentMethodIcon(String method) { - switch (method.toLowerCase()) { - case 'wire transfer': - return HeroIcons.buildingLibrary; - case 'transferencia bancaria': - return HeroIcons.buildingLibrary; - case 'revolut': - return HeroIcons.creditCard; - default: - return HeroIcons.banknotes; - } +enum PaymentMethodType { + bankTransfer, + digitalWallet, + other +} + +PaymentMethodType _getPaymentMethodType(String method) { + final lowerMethod = method.toLowerCase(); + if (lowerMethod.contains('transfer') || lowerMethod.contains('bancaria')) { + return PaymentMethodType.bankTransfer; + } else if (lowerMethod.contains('revolut')) { + return PaymentMethodType.digitalWallet; + } + return PaymentMethodType.other; +} + +HeroIcons _getPaymentMethodIcon(String method) { + switch (_getPaymentMethodType(method)) { + case PaymentMethodType.bankTransfer: + return HeroIcons.buildingLibrary; + case PaymentMethodType.digitalWallet: + return HeroIcons.creditCard; + case PaymentMethodType.other: + return HeroIcons.banknotes; + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.enum PaymentMethodType { bankTransfer, digitalWallet, other } PaymentMethodType _getPaymentMethodType(String method) { final lowerMethod = method.toLowerCase(); if (lowerMethod.contains('transfer') || lowerMethod.contains('bancaria')) { return PaymentMethodType.bankTransfer; } else if (lowerMethod.contains('revolut')) { return PaymentMethodType.digitalWallet; } return PaymentMethodType.other; } HeroIcons _getPaymentMethodIcon(String method) { switch (_getPaymentMethodType(method)) { case PaymentMethodType.bankTransfer: return HeroIcons.buildingLibrary; case PaymentMethodType.digitalWallet: return HeroIcons.creditCard; case PaymentMethodType.other: return HeroIcons.banknotes; } }
13-138:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd semantic labels for accessibility.
The widget lacks proper semantic labels which are important for screen readers and accessibility.
GestureDetector( + semanticLabel: 'Order from ${order.user} for ${order.amount} sats', onTap: () { // ... existing code }, child: Container(📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.Widget build(BuildContext context) { return GestureDetector( semanticLabel: 'Order from ${order.user} for ${order.amount} sats', onTap: () { Navigator.of(context).push( MaterialPageRoute( builder: (context) => OrderDetailsScreen(initialOrder: order), ), ); }, child: Container( margin: const EdgeInsets.symmetric(vertical: 8, horizontal: 16), decoration: BoxDecoration( color: const Color(0xFF1D212C), borderRadius: BorderRadius.circular(12), ), child: Padding( padding: const EdgeInsets.all(16), child: Column( crossAxisAlignment: CrossAxisAlignment.start, children: [ Row( mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.spaceBetween, children: [ Text( '${order.user} ${order.rating}/5 (${order.ratingCount})', style: const TextStyle(color: Colors.white), ), Text( 'Time: ${order.timeAgo}', style: const TextStyle(color: Colors.white), ), ], ), const SizedBox(height: 16), Row( mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.spaceBetween, crossAxisAlignment: CrossAxisAlignment.start, children: [ Expanded( flex: 3, child: Column( crossAxisAlignment: CrossAxisAlignment.start, children: [ Text.rich( TextSpan( children: [ buildStyledTextSpan( 'offering ', '${order.amount}', isValue: true, isBold: true, ), const TextSpan( text: "sats", style: TextStyle( color: Colors.white, fontWeight: FontWeight.normal, fontSize: 16.0, ), ), ], ), ), const SizedBox(height: 8.0), Text.rich( TextSpan( children: [ buildStyledTextSpan( 'for ', '${order.fiatAmount}', isValue: true, isBold: true, ), TextSpan( text: '${order.fiatCurrency} ', style: const TextStyle( color: Colors.white, fontSize: 16.0, ), ), TextSpan( text: '(${order.premium}%)', style: const TextStyle( color: Colors.white, fontSize: 16.0, ), ), ], ), ), ], ), ), const SizedBox(width: 16), Expanded( flex: 4, child: Row( children: [ HeroIcon( _getPaymentMethodIcon(order.paymentMethod), style: HeroIconStyle.outline, color: Colors.white, size: 16, ), const SizedBox(width: 4), Flexible( child: Text( order.paymentMethod, style: const TextStyle(color: Colors.grey), overflow: TextOverflow.visible, softWrap: true, ), ), ], ), ), ], ), const SizedBox(height: 8), // Optional spacer after the row ], ), ), ), ); }lib/presentation/auth/screens/register_screen.dart (4)
134-136:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd maximum length validation for PIN.
While there's a minimum length check of 4 digits, there's no maximum length restriction which could lead to security issues or usability problems.
if (value.length < 4) { return 'PIN must be at least 4 digits'; } + if (value.length > 8) { + return 'PIN must not exceed 8 digits'; + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (value.length < 4) { return 'PIN must be at least 4 digits'; } if (value.length > 8) { return 'PIN must not exceed 8 digits'; }
99-102:
⚠️ Potential issueStrengthen private key validation.
The current regex allows both uppercase and lowercase hex characters, which might lead to confusion or errors. Consider normalizing the input or being more strict with the format.
- !RegExp(r'^[0-9a-fA-F]{64}$').hasMatch(value)) { + !RegExp(r'^[0-9a-f]{64}$').hasMatch(value.toLowerCase())) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (!value.startsWith('nsec') && !RegExp(r'^[0-9a-f]{64}$').hasMatch(value.toLowerCase())) { return 'Invalid private key format'; }
207-217: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance security in registration handler.
Consider these security improvements:
- Sanitize the private key input before use
- Clear sensitive form data after registration attempt
void _onRegister() { if (_formKey.currentState!.validate()) { + final sanitizedKey = _privateKeyController.text.trim().toLowerCase(); context.read<AuthBloc>().add( AuthRegisterRequested( - _privateKeyController.text, + sanitizedKey, _pinController.text, _useBiometrics, ), ); + // Clear sensitive data + _privateKeyController.clear(); + _pinController.clear(); + _confirmPinController.clear(); } }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
174-185: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding user feedback for biometrics availability.
When biometrics are not available, the user isn't informed why the option is missing. Consider showing a disabled switch with an explanation when
_biometricsAvailableis false.- if (_biometricsAvailable) SwitchListTile( title: const Text('Use Biometrics', style: TextStyle(color: Colors.white)), - value: _useBiometrics, - onChanged: (bool value) { + value: _biometricsAvailable ? _useBiometrics : false, + onChanged: _biometricsAvailable ? (bool value) { setState(() { _useBiometrics = value; }); - }, + } : null, activeColor: Colors.green, + subtitle: !_biometricsAvailable ? const Text( + 'Biometric authentication is not available on this device', + style: TextStyle(color: Colors.white70), + ) : null, ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.SwitchListTile( title: const Text('Use Biometrics', style: TextStyle(color: Colors.white)), value: _biometricsAvailable ? _useBiometrics : false, onChanged: _biometricsAvailable ? (bool value) { setState(() { _useBiometrics = value; }); } : null, activeColor: Colors.green, subtitle: !_biometricsAvailable ? const Text( 'Biometric authentication is not available on this device', style: TextStyle(color: Colors.white70), ) : null, ),lib/core/utils/auth_utils.dart (3)
7-8:
⚠️ Potential issueHash the PIN before storing it
Storing the PIN in plain text poses a security risk. It's recommended to hash the PIN before storing to enhance security.
Add the necessary imports at the top of the file:
import 'dart:convert'; import 'package:crypto/crypto.dart';Modify the code to hash the PIN before storing:
await _storage.write(key: 'user_private_key', value: privateKey); -var await _storage.write(key: 'user_pin', value: pin); +var bytes = utf8.encode(pin); +var hashedPin = sha256.convert(bytes).toString(); +await _storage.write(key: 'user_pin', value: hashedPin);
4-4:
⚠️ Potential issueUse
finalinstead ofconstfor_storage
FlutterSecureStoragecannot be a compile-time constant; therefore,_storageshould be declared asfinalinstead ofconstto avoid potential runtime errors.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-static const _storage = FlutterSecureStorage(); +static final _storage = FlutterSecureStorage();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.static final _storage = FlutterSecureStorage();
16-18:
⚠️ Potential issueHash the input PIN and handle null stored PIN
To verify the PIN correctly, hash the input PIN before comparison. Also, handle cases where no PIN is stored to avoid null reference issues.
Modify the code as follows:
final storedPin = await _storage.read(key: 'user_pin'); +if (storedPin == null) { + return false; +} +var bytes = utf8.encode(inputPin); +var hashedInputPin = sha256.convert(bytes).toString(); -return storedPin == inputPin; +return storedPin == hashedInputPin;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
lib/data/repositories/auth_repository.dart (3)
27-31: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Provide a fallback for PIN authentication when biometrics are enabled
In the
loginmethod, when biometrics are enabled, the PIN is not utilized. If users should be able to authenticate using their PIN as a fallback (e.g., if biometric authentication fails or is unavailable), consider adding logic to handle this scenario to enhance user experience.
22-23: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueUse a logging framework instead of print statements and maintain consistent comment language
Using
Apply this diff to address the issues:
- print('Error in AuthRepository.register: $e'); - rethrow; // Re-lanza el error para que pueda ser manejado en el Bloc + // Log the error + logger.error('Error in AuthRepository.register', e); + rethrow; // Re-throw the error so it can be handled in the BlocCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
15-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Throw a more specific exception for invalid private keys
Throwing a general
Exceptioncan make error handling less precise. Consider defining and throwing a more specific exception, such asInvalidPrivateKeyException, to improve clarity and enable finer-grained exception handling.Apply this diff to improve exception handling:
- throw Exception('Invalid private key'); + throw InvalidPrivateKeyException('Invalid private key');Ensure that
InvalidPrivateKeyExceptionis defined or imported appropriately in your codebase.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
lib/presentation/home/bloc/home_bloc.dart (3)
71-74:
⚠️ Potential issueMark the
closemethod asasyncto await cancellationThe
closemethod should be marked asasyncand await theordersSubscription.cancel()to ensure all asynchronous operations complete before the bloc is disposed.Apply this fix:
@override -Future<void> close() { - ordersSubscription?.cancel(); +Future<void> close() async { + await ordersSubscription?.cancel(); return super.close(); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.Future<void> close() async { await ordersSubscription?.cancel(); return super.close(); }
62-68: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the filter logic in
_filterOrdersByTypeFor improved readability, consider mapping the
OrderTypeto a corresponding string before filtering.Apply this change:
List<OrderModel> _filterOrdersByType(List<OrderModel> orders, OrderType type) { + final String typeString = type == OrderType.buy ? 'buy' : 'sell'; return orders - .where((order) => - type == OrderType.buy ? order.type == 'buy' : order.type == 'sell') + .where((order) => order.type == typeString) .toList(); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.List<OrderModel> _filterOrdersByType( List<OrderModel> orders, OrderType type) { final String typeString = type == OrderType.buy ? 'buy' : 'sell'; return orders .where((order) => order.type == typeString) .toList(); }
38-46:
⚠️ Potential issuePrevent duplicate orders in
_onOrderReceivedAdding orders without checking for duplicates may result in duplicate entries in
allOrders. Consider checking if the order already exists before adding it.You can modify the code as follows to prevent duplicates:
final updatedAllOrders = List<OrderModel>.from(state.allOrders); +if (!updatedAllOrders.contains(event.order)) { + updatedAllOrders.add(event.order); +}Ensure that
OrderModelimplements the==operator andhashCodemethod to allow proper comparison within the list.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
lib/presentation/auth/bloc/auth_bloc.dart (4)
44-44:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid exposing exception details to the user
Emitting the raw exception message may expose sensitive information. Provide a user-friendly error message instead.
Apply this diff to emit a generic error message:
- emit(AuthFailure(e.toString())); + emit(const AuthFailure('Registration failed. Please try again.'));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.emit(const AuthFailure('Registration failed. Please try again.'));
68-68:
⚠️ Potential issueVerify the state emitted after logout
After logging out, the
AuthUnregisteredstate is emitted. Should this beAuthUnauthenticatedto indicate the user is logged out but still registered? EmittingAuthUnregisteredmight suggest the user's registration data has been removed.Consider applying this diff to emit the appropriate state:
- emit(AuthUnregistered()); + emit(AuthUnauthenticated());📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.emit(AuthUnauthenticated());
42-43:
⚠️ Potential issueReplace print statements with proper logging
Using
Apply this diff to use a logging framework:
- print('Error during registration: $e'); - print('Stack trace: $stackTrace'); + // Use a logging framework to log errors and stack traces + logger.error('Error during registration', e, stackTrace);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
60-60:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid exposing exception details to the user
Directly emitting exception messages can reveal sensitive information. Consider providing a user-friendly error message to inform the user of the failure.
Apply this diff to emit a generic error message:
- emit(AuthFailure(e.toString())); + emit(const AuthFailure('Login failed. Please check your credentials and try again.'));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.emit(const AuthFailure('Login failed. Please check your credentials and try again.'));lib/main.dart (3)
86-89:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid potential navigation conflicts by removing
initialRoute.Setting both
initialRouteinMaterialAppand performing navigation usingBlocListenercan lead to unexpected behavior, such as duplicate navigations or conflicts. Since you're handling navigation based on authentication state inBlocListener, it's better to remove theinitialRouteparameter.Apply this diff to remove the
initialRoute:- initialRoute: isFirstLaunch ? AppRoutes.welcome : AppRoutes.home, routes: AppRoutes.routes, onGenerateRoute: AppRoutes.onGenerateRoute,Ensure that your
AuthBlocproperly manages the initial navigation to either the welcome or home screen based on the authentication state.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.routes: AppRoutes.routes, onGenerateRoute: AppRoutes.onGenerateRoute, ),
68-70: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Initialize
ProfileBlocwith necessary dependencies.Similar to
ChatListBloc, ensure thatProfileBlocreceives any required services or repositories.Apply this diff if dependencies are needed:
BlocProvider<ProfileBloc>( - create: (context) => ProfileBloc(), + create: (context) => ProfileBloc( + // Inject required dependencies here + ), ),Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
65-67: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider passing required dependencies to
ChatListBloc.Currently,
ChatListBlocis created without any parameters. If it requires services or repositories, consider injecting them for consistency and testability.Apply this diff if dependencies are needed:
BlocProvider<ChatListBloc>( - create: (context) => ChatListBloc(), + create: (context) => ChatListBloc( + // Inject required dependencies here + ), ),Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
lib/data/models/nostr_event.dart (2)
6-6: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making
idandsigfinal for immutabilityMaking
idandsigfinal properties enhances immutability, leading to safer and more predictable code. Since these fields are assigned during the signing process, consider adjusting your design to avoid mutating them after object creation, perhaps by returning a new instance from thesignmethod or initializing them via the constructor.Also applies to: 12-12
59-69:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd null checks in
fromJsonto enhance robustnessIn the
fromJsonfactory method, accessing JSON fields without null checks may lead to exceptions if the expected keys are missing or null. Consider adding null checks or providing default values to handle potential null inputs, improving the method's robustness.Apply this diff to add null checks:
factory P2POrderEvent.fromJson(Map<String, dynamic> json) { return P2POrderEvent( - id: json['id'], - pubkey: json['pubkey'], - createdAt: json['created_at'], - tags: List<List<String>>.from( - json['tags'].map((tag) => List<String>.from(tag))), - content: json['content'], - sig: json['sig'], + id: json['id'] ?? '', + pubkey: json['pubkey'] ?? '', + createdAt: json['created_at'] ?? 0, + tags: json['tags'] != null + ? List<List<String>>.from( + json['tags'].map((tag) => List<String>.from(tag))) + : [], + content: json['content'] ?? '', + sig: json['sig'] ?? '', ); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.factory P2POrderEvent.fromJson(Map<String, dynamic> json) { return P2POrderEvent( id: json['id'] ?? '', pubkey: json['pubkey'] ?? '', createdAt: json['created_at'] ?? 0, tags: json['tags'] != null ? List<List<String>>.from( json['tags'].map((tag) => List<String>.from(tag))) : [], content: json['content'] ?? '', sig: json['sig'] ?? '', ); }lib/data/models/order_model.dart (4)
150-151: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace
Using
Apply this diff to replace
First, import the logging package:
import 'package:logger/logger.dart'; final logger = Logger();Then, replace the
// In parseRating function - print('Error parsing rating JSON: $e'); + logger.e('Error parsing rating JSON', e); // In fromEventTags factory constructor - print('Error creating OrderModel from tags: $e'); + logger.e('Error creating OrderModel from tags', e);Also applies to: 184-185
167-167: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Clarify usage of
currencyandfiatCurrencyfieldsBoth
currencyandfiatCurrencyare assigned the same value fromgetString('f'). This duplication may cause confusion.Consider whether both fields are necessary and, if so, ensure they represent different values. If they are the same, you might remove one of them to reduce redundancy.
Also applies to: 169-169
190-195:
⚠️ Potential issueIncorrect time calculation in
_timeAgofunctionSubtracting 24 hours from the event time may lead to inaccurate time calculations. This adjustment seems unintended and could misrepresent the actual time ago.
Consider removing the subtraction of 24 hours to use the actual event time:
String _timeAgo(int timestamp) { final DateTime eventTime = - DateTime.fromMillisecondsSinceEpoch(timestamp * 1000) - .subtract(Duration(hours: 24)); + DateTime.fromMillisecondsSinceEpoch(timestamp * 1000); return timeago.format(eventTime, allowFromNow: true); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.String _timeAgo(int timestamp) { final DateTime eventTime = DateTime.fromMillisecondsSinceEpoch(timestamp * 1000); return timeago.format(eventTime, allowFromNow: true); }
79-103:
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent JSON keys between
toJsonandfromJsonmethodsThe
toJsonmethod uses camelCase keys (e.g., 'ratingCount'), while thefromJsonmethod expects snake_case keys (e.g., 'rating_count'). This inconsistency can lead to issues during serialization and deserialization.Consider aligning the JSON keys in both methods to ensure consistency. You can modify the keys in
toJsonto match those infromJson, or vice versa. Alternatively, use a JSON serialization library likejson_annotationandjson_serializableto handle this automatically.Apply this diff to fix the key names in
toJson:'id': id, 'type': type, 'user': user, 'rating': rating, -'ratingCount': ratingCount, +'rating_count': ratingCount, 'amount': amount, 'currency': currency, -'fiatAmount': fiatAmount, +'fiat_amount': fiatAmount, -'fiatCurrency': fiatCurrency, +'fiat_currency': fiatCurrency, -'paymentMethod': paymentMethod, +'payment_method': paymentMethod, -'timeAgo': timeAgo, +'time_ago': timeAgo, 'premium': premium, 'status': status, 'satsAmount': satsAmount, -'sellerName': sellerName, +'seller_name': sellerName, -'sellerRating': sellerRating, +'seller_rating': sellerRating, -'sellerReviewCount': sellerReviewCount, +'seller_review_count': sellerReviewCount, -'sellerAvatar': sellerAvatar, +'seller_avatar': sellerAvatar, -'exchangeRate': exchangeRate, +'exchange_rate': exchangeRate, -'buyerSatsAmount': buyerSatsAmount, +'buyer_sats_amount': buyerSatsAmount, -'buyerFiatAmount': buyerFiatAmount, +'buyer_fiat_amount': buyerFiatAmount,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.Map<String, dynamic> toJson() { return { 'id': id, 'type': type, 'user': user, 'rating': rating, 'rating_count': ratingCount, 'amount': amount, 'currency': currency, 'fiat_amount': fiatAmount, 'fiat_currency': fiatCurrency, 'payment_method': paymentMethod, 'time_ago': timeAgo, 'premium': premium, 'status': status, 'satsAmount': satsAmount, 'seller_name': sellerName, 'seller_rating': sellerRating, 'seller_review_count': sellerReviewCount, 'seller_avatar': sellerAvatar, 'exchange_rate': exchangeRate, 'buyer_sats_amount': buyerSatsAmount, 'buyer_fiat_amount': buyerFiatAmount, }; }lib/core/utils/nostr_utils.dart (7)
41-45:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation to
nsecToHexmethod.The
nsecToHexmethod assumes that if the input does not start with'nsec', it is already in hex format. This might lead to unexpected behavior if the input is invalid or in an incorrect format. Consider adding input validation and error handling to manage invalid inputs gracefully.
76-84: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid unnecessary key pair generation in
createEvent.In the
createEventmethod, you generate a key pair from the provided private key, but only the private key is needed for signing. Generating a key pair here is unnecessary and may lead to redundant computations.Consider using the private key directly or deriving the public key using
derivePublicKey(privateKey)if needed.
190-196:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect the shared secret computation in
_calculateSharedSecret.The current implementation of
_calculateSharedSecretdoes not correctly compute the ECDH shared secret. It hashes the public key derived from the private key, which is not the correct method for key agreement.Consider using an appropriate cryptographic function to perform ECDH key agreement between the private key and the peer's public key. You may need to use a library that supports ECDH operations, such as
package:pointycastle.
198-203:
⚠️ Potential issueSpecify AES mode and padding in encryption methods.
In
_encryptNIP44and_decryptNIP44, the AES encryption mode and padding are not specified. By default, theencryptpackage may use AES ECB mode, which is insecure. For secure encryption, specify the mode (e.g., CBC) and padding.Apply this diff to specify AES mode and padding:
static String _encryptNIP44(String content, Uint8List key) { final iv = encrypt.IV.fromSecureRandom(16); - final encrypter = encrypt.Encrypter(encrypt.AES(encrypt.Key(key))); + final encrypter = encrypt.Encrypter(encrypt.AES( + encrypt.Key(key), + mode: encrypt.AESMode.cbc, + padding: 'PKCS7', + )); final encrypted = encrypter.encrypt(content, iv: iv); return base64Encode(iv.bytes + encrypted.bytes); } static String _decryptNIP44(String encryptedContent, Uint8List key) { final decoded = base64Decode(encryptedContent); final iv = encrypt.IV(decoded.sublist(0, 16)); final encryptedBytes = decoded.sublist(16); - final encrypter = encrypt.Encrypter(encrypt.AES(encrypt.Key(key))); + final encrypter = encrypt.Encrypter(encrypt.AES( + encrypt.Key(key), + mode: encrypt.AESMode.cbc, + padding: 'PKCS7', + )); return encrypter.decrypt( encrypt.Encrypted(encryptedBytes), iv: iv, ); }Alternatively, consider using AES GCM mode for authenticated encryption to provide both confidentiality and integrity.
Also applies to: 205-210
178-188:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential null values in
decryptNIP59Event.In
decryptNIP59Event, using null-aware operators to defaultevent.contentandrumorEvent.contentto empty strings might lead to decryption errors if the content is actually null or empty.Add checks to ensure that
event.contentandrumorEvent.contentare not null before attempting decryption, and handle cases where they might be null.
103-118:
⚠️ Potential issueValidate event data in
generateIdmethod.The
generateIdmethod constructs a JSON string fromeventDatawithout checking if all required keys are present. If any key is missing, it could lead to a runtime error. Add validation to ensure that all necessary keys are provided.Apply this diff to add validation:
static String generateId(Map<String, dynamic> eventData) { + // Validate required keys + final requiredKeys = ['pubkey', 'created_at', 'kind', 'tags', 'content']; + for (final key in requiredKeys) { + if (!eventData.containsKey(key)) { + throw ArgumentError('Missing required key: $key'); + } + } final jsonString = jsonEncode([ 0, // Versión del eventoCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
123-151:
⚠️ Potential issueAssign the signature to the event in
createNIP59Event.After signing the event ID with
signMessage, the signature is not assigned to the event'ssigfield. This means the event may be considered invalid when processed by other entities.Apply this diff to assign the signature:
// Generate ID and signature final id = generateId({ 'pubkey': rumorEvent.pubkey, 'created_at': rumorEvent.createdAt!.millisecondsSinceEpoch ~/ 1000, 'kind': rumorEvent.kind, 'tags': rumorEvent.tags, 'content': rumorEvent.content, }); - signMessage(id, senderPrivateKey); + final signature = signMessage(id, senderPrivateKey); + rumorEvent.id = id; + rumorEvent.sig = signature;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.final senderKeyPair = generateKeyPairFromPrivateKey(senderPrivateKey); final sharedSecret = _calculateSharedSecret(senderPrivateKey, recipientPubKey); final encryptedContent = _encryptNIP44(content, sharedSecret); final createdAt = DateTime.now(); final rumorEvent = NostrEvent( kind: 1059, pubkey: senderKeyPair.public, content: encryptedContent, tags: [ ["p", recipientPubKey] ], createdAt: createdAt, id: '', // Se generará después sig: '', // Se generará después ); // Generar ID y firma final id = generateId({ 'pubkey': rumorEvent.pubkey, 'created_at': rumorEvent.createdAt!.millisecondsSinceEpoch ~/ 1000, 'kind': rumorEvent.kind, 'tags': rumorEvent.tags, 'content': rumorEvent.content, }); final signature = signMessage(id, senderPrivateKey); rumorEvent.id = id; rumorEvent.sig = signature;lib/presentation/add_order/screens/add_order_screen.dart (5)
109-133: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor '_buildSellForm' and '_buildBuyForm' to reduce code duplication
The
_buildSellFormand_buildBuyFormmethods share similar structures with minor differences. Refactor these methods to a single method that builds the form dynamically based on the order type, enhancing maintainability.Create a generic form-building method:
Widget _buildOrderForm(BuildContext context, OrderType orderType) { // Common form fields // Use conditionals to handle orderType-specific fields }Replace the calls to
_buildSellFormand_buildBuyFormwith_buildOrderForm(context, state.currentType).Also applies to: 135-162
206-219:
⚠️ Potential issueManage the 'Fixed' switch state using BLoC
The
Switchwidget'svalueis currently hard-coded tofalse, and theonChangedcallback is empty. To reflect the actual state and handle user interaction, manage the switch state through the BLoC.Modify the switch to use the state from the BLoC:
- Switch( - value: false, // You should manage this state in the bloc - onChanged: (value) { - // Update the state in the bloc - }, - ), + Switch( + value: context.watch<AddOrderBloc>().state.isFixedPrice, + onChanged: (value) { + context.read<AddOrderBloc>().add(ToggleFixedPrice(value)); + }, + ),Ensure that
AddOrderStateincludes anisFixedPriceproperty and handle theToggleFixedPriceevent in yourAddOrderBloc.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
221-251: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Connect the 'SUBMIT' button to BLoC to handle order submission
Currently, the 'SUBMIT' button prints values and closes the screen without actual data handling. Integrate the button with the BLoC to manage form submission and state changes effectively.
Update the
onPressedfunction to dispatch an event to the BLoC:ElevatedButton( onPressed: () { - // For now, just print the values and close the screen - print('Fiat Code: ${_fiatCodeController.text}'); - print('Fiat Amount: ${_fiatAmountController.text}'); - print('Sats Amount: ${_satsAmountController.text}'); - print('Payment Method: ${_paymentMethodController.text}'); - if (_lightningInvoiceController.text.isNotEmpty) { - print('Lightning Invoice: ${_lightningInvoiceController.text}'); - } - Navigator.of(context).pop(); + if (_formKey.currentState?.validate() ?? false) { + context.read<AddOrderBloc>().add(SubmitOrderEvent( + fiatCode: _fiatCodeController.text, + fiatAmount: _fiatAmountController.text, + satsAmount: _satsAmountController.text, + paymentMethod: _paymentMethodController.text, + lightningInvoice: _lightningInvoiceController.text, + )); + } },Remember to define
SubmitOrderEventin your BLoC and handle the logic for order submission.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
10-17:
⚠️ Potential issueConvert AddOrderScreen to StatefulWidget to properly manage TextEditingControllers
The
AddOrderScreencurrently extendsStatelessWidgetbut initializesTextEditingControllerinstances.TextEditingControlleris a stateful resource that should be disposed of to prevent memory leaks. To manage these controllers appropriately, convertAddOrderScreento aStatefulWidgetand dispose of the controllers in thedisposemethod.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-class AddOrderScreen extends StatelessWidget { - AddOrderScreen({super.key}); +class AddOrderScreen extends StatefulWidget { + const AddOrderScreen({super.key}); + + @override + _AddOrderScreenState createState() => _AddOrderScreenState(); +} + +class _AddOrderScreenState extends State<AddOrderScreen> { + final _fiatCodeController = TextEditingController(); + final _fiatAmountController = TextEditingController(); + final _satsAmountController = TextEditingController(); + final _paymentMethodController = TextEditingController(); + final _lightningInvoiceController = TextEditingController(); + + @override + void dispose() { + _fiatCodeController.dispose(); + _fiatAmountController.dispose(); + _satsAmountController.dispose(); + _paymentMethodController.dispose(); + _lightningInvoiceController.dispose(); + super.dispose(); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.class AddOrderScreen extends StatefulWidget { const AddOrderScreen({super.key}); @override _AddOrderScreenState createState() => _AddOrderScreenState(); } class _AddOrderScreenState extends State<AddOrderScreen> { final _fiatCodeController = TextEditingController(); final _fiatAmountController = TextEditingController(); final _satsAmountController = TextEditingController(); final _paymentMethodController = TextEditingController(); final _lightningInvoiceController = TextEditingController(); @override void dispose() { _fiatCodeController.dispose(); _fiatAmountController.dispose(); _satsAmountController.dispose(); _paymentMethodController.dispose(); _lightningInvoiceController.dispose(); super.dispose(); }
185-204: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use TextFormField instead of TextField for input validation
Replacing
TextFieldwithTextFormFieldallows for form-level validation, which enhances user input handling. This change enables the use of validators to ensure the correctness of the input data.Apply this diff to implement input validation:
- child: TextField( + child: TextFormField( controller: controller, style: const TextStyle(color: Colors.white), decoration: InputDecoration( border: InputBorder.none, labelText: label, labelStyle: const TextStyle(color: Colors.grey), suffixIcon: suffix != null ? Icon(suffix, color: Colors.grey) : null, ), + validator: (value) { + // Add your validation logic here + if (value == null || value.isEmpty) { + return 'Please enter $label'; + } + return null; + }, ),Ensure to wrap your input fields within a
Formwidget and manage aGlobalKey<FormState>to validate the form when submitting.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
lib/presentation/order/screens/order_details_screen.dart (1)
59-59: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract repeated color constants into a shared theme or constants file
The color
Color(0xFF8CC541)is used multiple times throughout the code. Consider defining it as a constant or adding it to your theme data to promote consistency and ease of maintenance.Define a color constant:
const kAccentColor = Color(0xFF8CC541);Then update the code to use the constant:
- color: Color(0xFF8CC541), + color: kAccentColor,Also applies to: 117-117, 126-126, 225-225, 286-286
This pull request combines changes that were made in the /MostroP2P/mobile/fix/nostr-connection branch and fixes to build the app for Linux and Android.
It's currently extremely difficult to re-base the repository due to the large number of build files that have been previously committed. These extraneous files account for > 400Mb of the total git repo size and should be purged using
git filter-repobefore many more contributions are merged. This will involve rewriting much of the repo's commit history though.I did want to land these changes before doing that, so at least there is a working
mainbranch with the recent additions for people to test and review.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores