Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing PAQs are currently filled with 3, this is wrong for different val_ranges #33

Open
MitchellAcoustics opened this issue Apr 1, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@MitchellAcoustics
Copy link
Owner

The standard approach to dealing with individual missing PAQs (i.e. someone just forgot to answer e.g. eventful, but answered everything else) has been to fill this with a neutral response. In the standard 5-point Likert scale this is coded as 3, however this is wrong if we have a new range of values (e.g. 0-100 like in SATP). This should either be corrected to just use the mid-point value or choose a different method of dealing with few missing PAQ responses.

@MitchellAcoustics MitchellAcoustics added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 1, 2022
@MitchellAcoustics MitchellAcoustics self-assigned this Apr 1, 2022
@MitchellAcoustics
Copy link
Owner Author

Filling with the neutral value is probably wrong to do anyway. Is it possible to just do the ISO calculation while dropping a PAQ? Might need to adjust how the scaling value is calculated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant