You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
Up to now, the time array of the combined working standard were computed via the weighted average routine. In #162, a dedicated time array for the CWS has been put in place - for now, simply starting at 0 on the first step.
What is required, however, is to decide which step corresponds to the rig launch time. And for that, there is currently no routines in dvas.
@GonzagueRomanens : I'd be keen to talk to you about this at some point. Right now, I'm leaning towards using the GRUAN established launch times. These are present in the RS-41 GDPs ... to be seen if they get included in other GDPs ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey @cfelix-ch, adding the cws_alt to the GDP plots requires (in part) to fix this issue.
If you and @GonzagueRomanens agree, I propose to adopt an "all-or-nothing" startegy here as well: namely, I will take the launch time to be the latest one among the GDPs. Essentially, this means that the CWS will "launch" when all three GDPs say they have launched.
Describe the bug
Up to now, the time array of the combined working standard were computed via the weighted average routine. In #162, a dedicated time array for the CWS has been put in place - for now, simply starting at 0 on the first step.
What is required, however, is to decide which step corresponds to the rig launch time. And for that, there is currently no routines in dvas.
@GonzagueRomanens : I'd be keen to talk to you about this at some point. Right now, I'm leaning towards using the GRUAN established launch times. These are present in the RS-41 GDPs ... to be seen if they get included in other GDPs ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: