Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consider adding #package:requires: as a shortcut #69

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 24, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

consider adding #package:requires: as a shortcut #69

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 24, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

from Hilaire Fernandes:

Learning Montacello configuration.

Instead of writing a package dependency as

  spec
   package: 'CoolToolSet--Core' with: [spec requires: 'CoolBrowser ALL']

Can't we write more clearly as;

spec package: 'CoolToolSet--Core' requires: 'CoolBrowser ALL'

I find the first one far too cryptic.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 24 Mar 2010 at 7:15

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by [email protected] on 24 Mar 2010 at 7:15

  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

see 
http://n4.nabble.com/Montacello-configuration-writing-td1680590.html#a1680590 
for
discussion

Original comment by [email protected] on 24 Mar 2010 at 7:19

  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

related to Issue 154 ... might make sense to include a set of shortcuts?

Original comment by [email protected] on 25 Jan 2012 at 10:34

  • Added labels: Milestone-1.0-beta.32
  • Removed labels: ****

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant