-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(deps): Bump @metamask/utils
from ^8.2.1
to ^9.1.0
#26551
Conversation
CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes. |
@metamask/utils
from ^8.2.1
to ^9.1.0
any
typing of Infer
and downstream types, bump @metamask/utils
from ^8.2.1
to ^9.1.0
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
f7c81bc
to
1a01a8d
Compare
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
👍 Dependency issues cleared. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎ This PR previously contained dependency changes with security issues that have been resolved, removed, or ignored. |
@SocketSecurity ignore npm/[email protected] benign author change |
1a01a8d
to
9f4ebb8
Compare
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
022919e
to
e48a6ef
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
78fdb3b
to
5776b71
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Needs rebase with develop
and conflict-resolution - LGTM otherwise
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
5a5b3c2
to
9798d5e
Compare
9798d5e
to
db0de41
Compare
@metamaskbot update-policies |
Policies updated |
Builds ready [a3dbcaa]
Page Load Metrics (1813 ± 101 ms)
Bundle size diffs [🚀 Bundle size reduced!]
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Builds ready [04ef2c0]
Page Load Metrics (1861 ± 147 ms)
Bundle size diffs [🚀 Bundle size reduced!]
|
Description
Major version bump for
@metamask/utils
.@metamask/utils
andsuperstruct
types downstream ofInfer
being typed as implicitany
, suppressing valid type errors.@metamask/eth-json-rpc-middleware
to^14.0.0
,@metamask/transaction-controller
to^35.1.1
#26143Related issues
@metamask/eth-json-rpc-middleware
to^14.0.0
,@metamask/transaction-controller
to^35.1.1
#26143Manual testing steps
Screenshots/Recordings
Pre-merge author checklist
Pre-merge reviewer checklist