Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quantification of effectiveness of peak-finding methods #1

Open
Matthijs-utf8 opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Quantification of effectiveness of peak-finding methods #1

Matthijs-utf8 opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@Matthijs-utf8
Copy link
Owner

Objective: The primary goal of this issue is to systematically quantify and compare the effectiveness of various peak-finding methods currently in use or proposed for TimeTrace. This comparison aims to evaluate these methods based on accuracy, computational efficiency, and overall reliability in different scenarios.

Background: TimeTrace employs signal processing techniques to accurately detect and analyze the peaks in watch timing data. Recent discussions have highlighted several potential methods, including standard peak detection and its derivatives, autocorrelation, and sub-sample precision methods like parabolic fitting. However, there's a need for a systematic evaluation to determine which method or combination of methods provides the best balance between accuracy and computational efficiency, particularly in a Python environment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant