Some proposed tweaks #10
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lrettig
commented
Jun 16, 2019
|
|
||
| ## Motivation | ||
| <!--The motivation is critical for EIPs that want to change the Ethereum protocol. It should clearly explain why the existing protocol specification is inadequate to address the problem that the EIP solves. EIP submissions without sufficient motivation may be rejected outright.--> | ||
|
|
||
| The context for this proposal came from attending the [Core Dev Eth1.X Meeting](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au1Qll-86v0) in Berlin. Development is needed to move Eth1.X forward, and I observed that a lack of funding is the primary barrier to this work. This work can only be effectively conducted within the context of working groups forming around these issues, and these working groups need funding in order to pay dedicated contractors and project managers. This proposal is a plan for funding these groups and supporting their operation. | ||
| The context for this proposal came from attending the [Core Dev Eth1.X Meeting](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au1Qll-86v0) in Berlin. Development is needed to move Eth1.X forward, and I observed that a lack of funding is the primary barrier to this work. This work can only be effectively conducted by working groups forming around these issues, and these working groups need funding in order to pay dedicated contractors and project managers. This proposal is a plan for funding these groups and supporting their operation. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
a lack of funding is the primary barrier to this work
I don't agree with this statement, and I don't think Alexey does either. Let's discuss and include him in the conversation. (The problem is at least as much a lack of people with the necessary skills and interests, coordinators, professional management, etc.)
lrettig
commented
Jun 19, 2019
EIPS/eip-2025.md
Outdated
| @@ -11,56 +11,58 @@ requires: 1890 | |||
| --- | |||
|
|
|||
| ## Simple Summary | |||
| Add `0.044 ETH` per block for 18 months as a developer block reward reserved for funding Ethereum1.X development. | |||
| Add `0.044 ETH` per block for 18 months as a developer block reward reserved for funding Ethereum 1.X development. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add 0.044 ETH per block for 18 months as a developer block reward reserved for funding Ethereum1.X development
How do we define "Ethereum1.X development"? Should we say more about this or try to narrow the scope? Or just explicitly leave it up to the discretion of the governors/keyholders?
lrettig
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.