Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: bazel (and/or other build system) rulesets #233

Open
rbtcollins opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

feat: bazel (and/or other build system) rulesets #233

rbtcollins opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request not-planned

Comments

@rbtcollins
Copy link

Most of the time Bazel users generate a ruleset outside of the project the ruleset is for. Exceptions include a) things like GRPC that are natively maintained using Bazel, and b) developer orientated products where the user interface is one of their concerns.

Pavex seems to fall into (b) - and because you've got a big focus on the developer experience, extending that out into users of Bazel, nix, pants2, buck2 and other related build systems will likely be relevant/important.

Because pavex is doing code generation, it -is- going to interact with those systems, as sqlx does (e.g. launchbadge/sqlx#2927 ), and anything outside OSS sphere is IME increasingly likely to use such a system.

@LukeMathWalker
Copy link
Owner

LukeMathWalker commented Apr 1, 2024

This is something I'm interested in supporting as a first-party feature if there is a commercial partner who is willing to fund the work and test the integration.

Until that point, integration with non-cargo build systems will remain best-effort. Pavex works as long as there is a working installation of rustup.

@LukeMathWalker LukeMathWalker added enhancement New feature or request not-planned labels Apr 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request not-planned
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants