You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think that cross image encoder could use prior knowledge(consecutiveness of queries) of test dataset
from supplemetary material (table 10),
there is an ablation study of cross-image encoder
the performance on pitts30k is written below, No encoder : 90.6, 95.9, 97.2
Transformer encoder layer x 2(default) : 94.8, 97.4, 98.1
compare this performance of crica in the above link,
Hi, @Lu-Feng
Thanks you for an interesting research!
I have some question about cross image encoder.
from the question link below,
#7 (comment)
I think that cross image encoder could use prior knowledge(consecutiveness of queries) of test dataset
from supplemetary material (table 10),
there is an ablation study of cross-image encoder
the performance on pitts30k is written below,
No encoder : 90.6, 95.9, 97.2
Transformer encoder layer x 2(default) : 94.8, 97.4, 98.1
compare this performance of crica in the above link,
when test dataloader use shuffle=True,
it seems cross image encoder seems to have less impact when test dataloader shuffle=True.
and i think that this issue should be solved .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: