Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorporate securitySchemes #111

Open
conrs opened this issue Sep 23, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Incorporate securitySchemes #111

conrs opened this issue Sep 23, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request JiraIssueCreated Low Priority question Further information is requested

Comments

@conrs
Copy link

conrs commented Sep 23, 2020

e.g.

security:
  - LROrgId: []
  - BearerToken: []

components:
  parameters: {}
  securitySchemes:
    LROrgId:
      type: apiKey
      in: header
      name: LR-Org-Id
    BearerToken:
      type: http
      scheme: bearer

Useful to call out and the above are the standard auth and org ID specifications.

@sirishalal sirishalal added the question Further information is requested label Aug 12, 2021
@sirishalal
Copy link

Does anyone know what is it we are asking to be done here?

@forestgagnon
Copy link
Contributor

this is partially resolved by #159, but it might not be surfaced as well in the api doc renderer as using the a semantic openapi field like securitySchemes. Not sure. Seems low priority now that we have arbitrary HTTP header support.

@forestgagnon forestgagnon added Low Priority enhancement New feature or request labels Aug 18, 2021
@njaczko
Copy link
Contributor

njaczko commented Aug 18, 2021

It's also mostly duplicative of #21 (which we closed because it was partially resolved by #159)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request JiraIssueCreated Low Priority question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants