-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[QUESTION] How should I share a working authentik OIDC configuration? #1664
Comments
Hi Yeah the best will probably be to add this to the authentication docs on the oidc section in a subsection examples -> authentik. Feel free to clone make the changes, push and open a PR. For the differation from admin and user I allow myself to ping @twsouthwick as he was so kind and made this PR. Thanks! |
Thank you. I hope there is a way differentiate. I'll open a PR with the documentation changes. |
I created a PR for the authentik documentation changes. |
As the PR got merged, I'll close this. |
Should I open a separate question about the roles and being able to set admins via groups or users by using the |
Oh apologies, overlooked that it's also an issue, due to the nature of this thread and it being tagged as question, I'd rather create a new one, and directly tag twsouthwick |
Done. #1675 |
Question
I'm opening this up because I worked on getting
authentik
working with Dashy last night. I'm authenticating successfully and it's picking up groups successfully. I can hide pages/sections, etc based onauthentik
group membership.The only thing I haven't figured out is how to differentiate admins and users. I am looking for information on that if you could share how I can do that in Dashy. Maybe assigning an OIDC group to a
type: admin
. Not sure if that is implemented or not.How would you like this information shared with the community? I can open a PR against the docs and add it there if you'd like. Thank you in advance.
Category
Authentication
Please tick the boxes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: